Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > Sample Prep / Library Generation

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best mRNA isolation method for grasses grassgirl 454 Pyrosequencing 5 07-29-2013 09:52 PM
Bacterial genomic DNA isolation cheggers Sample Prep / Library Generation 0 10-04-2011 03:14 AM
BWA parameters for mRNA-seq aligning against mRNA refseq kwicher SOLiD 1 09-19-2011 04:45 AM
Dynabeads mRNA isolation problem bunnymac Sample Prep / Library Generation 5 05-09-2011 02:09 PM
Isolation of genomic DNA pDNA Sample Prep / Library Generation 0 05-10-2010 09:06 AM

Thread Tools
Old 08-26-2014, 07:11 AM   #1
Location: Winnipeg

Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 24
Default Isolation of mRNA

Hi everyone, just a quick question.

I am using a library protocol that uses a magnetic poly(A) isolation of mRNA, followed by a random hexamer based first strand cDNA synthesis step. The poly(A) kit is expensive and doesn't work well on smaller sample sizes, which I am using. My question is, why don't I just use a oligo(d)T based primer instead of a hexamer primer in my first strand synthesis and skip the poly(A) magnetic isolation. Why doesn't everyone do this instead of a magnetic poly(A) isolation step... do I expect more yield losses or rRNA contamination, or a substantially greater bias towards the poly(A) tail?

Thanks in advance,
Mike2188 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2014, 03:08 AM   #2
Jafar Jabbari
Location: Melbourne

Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,199

It depends on the type of library that you are preparing and experiment aim. If you use oligo(d)T, your cDNA and resulting library will have 3 bias as you have mentioned and you will not have much control on fragment length. For optimal results and analysis NGS libraries require certain insert size. I do not think that it will affect rRNA contamination level.
nucacidhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2014, 12:58 PM   #3
Senior Member
Location: Bioo Scientific, Austin, TX, USA

Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 119

Hi Mike,
At some point a full length mRNA needs to be broken into smaller fragments for Illumina or Ion sequencing. The options are to do this fragmentation on the RNA or on the double-stranded DNA, and it is typically faster, easier, and cheaper to do a chemical/heat (or enzymatic for Ion RNA-Seq) fragmentation of RNA rather than an acoustic or enzymatic shearing of double stranded DNA. Another advantage of fragmenting RNA and then priming with random hexamers is that the degree of 3' bias should not correlate with the length of the mRNA, which it typically will in oligo (d)T primed samples. Priming with random hexamers also provides more flexibility in working with different samples types, for example non-polyadenylated mRNAs from prokaryotes or partially degraded RNA samples.

Also, you did not mention what poly(A) isolation kit you are using, but there are probably less expensive options out there. For example my employer, Bioo Scientific, offers very cost-effective poly(A) beads.
kerplunk412 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2014, 06:19 PM   #4
Location: Winnipeg

Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 24

Thank you for the replies. They are much appreciated. Those kits are quite affordable for poly(A) isolation, but I am working with samples in about the 100-200 ng range, which is below the input for these kits. The poly(A) kits for bead isolation of small samples tend to be very expensive and tend to lose a lot of yield.
Mike2188 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO