SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > 454 Pyrosequencing



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Too many short reads and too little RAM? samanta General 5 09-22-2011 05:48 AM
Why using short reads? dbrg77 General 1 03-25-2011 08:01 AM
short sequencing reads vlee2 454 Pyrosequencing 4 02-28-2011 07:34 AM
454 Reads correction with Short reads ? yvan.wenger Bioinformatics 3 11-26-2010 04:17 AM
clustering short reads lpantano Bioinformatics 2 02-02-2010 05:56 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-02-2010, 01:04 AM   #1
nickloman
Senior Member
 
Location: Birmingham, UK

Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 356
Default Short reads - dodgy consumables?

After a short spell of good results, again we're getting way short reads on our 454 Titanium WGS runs. Last time this was down to dodgy consumables and Roche put a release out admitting there was a QC problem. Anyone else having problems recently?
nickloman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2010, 12:27 AM   #2
Zaag
Senior Member
 
Location: Amsterdam

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 112
Default

Yes, but not very consistent so this could be due to sample problems.
Zaag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 05:11 AM   #3
genes123
Junior Member
 
Location: Canada

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7
Default

Same for us, we've had 5-6 runs of very short reads (250bp average) in the past 3 weeks after 3-4 months of 400+bp (many samples had previously been successfully sequenced so not sample related)
genes123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 05:14 AM   #4
nickloman
Senior Member
 
Location: Birmingham, UK

Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 356
Default

Ah.

Perhaps it would be useful to compare lot numbers on consumables, do you have them to hand?
nickloman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 05:27 AM   #5
genes123
Junior Member
 
Location: Canada

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7
Default

Since we started using Seq kit 93801620 (for which they announced a new formulation of their substrate solution) although correlation is not perfect.
genes123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 07:02 AM   #6
nickloman
Senior Member
 
Location: Birmingham, UK

Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 356
Default

The engineer came:

It seems some of the tubes inside were dirty and wash flow may have been insufficient which means removal of residual dNTP after each cycle would be incomplete and so as the reads progress, there is increasing corruption of the read sequence due to overlapping reads after displacement of the end of the strand 'forwards' by illegitimate insertion of bases that should not be available in the next cycle (if I've understood correctly), a phenomenon called read-forward. Apparently Roche's analysis of the data suggested that this was indeed the problem.

This suggests to us we need to make sure the tubes are replaced at no more than 12 mo intervals and possibly as little as 6 mo.

(Edited this post for clarity)

Last edited by nickloman; 11-17-2010 at 05:39 AM.
nickloman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO