SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Number of Reads Increasing hamcan Bioinformatics 7 01-19-2017 11:27 AM
Increase the number of cycle with a 50 cycles MiSeq Reagent Kit v2 jsvinco Illumina/Solexa 2 10-21-2015 10:42 PM
different PCR cycle number for different microbiomes? petralutra 454 Pyrosequencing 1 08-01-2014 06:58 AM
MiSeq 600bp sequencing problem LizBent Illumina/Solexa 9 01-30-2014 05:53 AM
Maximum number of cycles from 300-cycle MiSeq kit... ECO Illumina/Solexa 13 11-09-2012 04:51 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-01-2019, 02:07 AM   #1
JasperGeh
Member
 
Location: Hanover, Germany

Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 13
Default Increasing MiSeq v3 cycle number for >600bp reads

Hello people!

We have a sequencing application where we could really need, say, 50100 more cycles from a 600-cycle MiSeq v3 kit.

Illumina states that the cartridge contains reagents for 625 cycles [1] (to account for dual indices we don't need, so 1015 more cycles there already).
Then again, ECO got about 370 cycles from a 300 cycle kit [2] which is a fair bit more than the 325 stated by Illumina. Other people also mentioned that they pushed above the 25 reserve index cycles [3].

Lastly, this post explains how MadsAlbertsen got 600 cycles from a 400 cycle kit by filling up some wells with reagents from leftover cartridges.

So, my question: Does anybody has experience with increasing the cycle number on the 600-cycle v3 kits and can tell me what safely works? Either by experimenting how many possible cycles are in one cartrige or by filling up from an old cartridge.
JasperGeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2019, 03:28 AM   #2
Bukowski
Senior Member
 
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 381
Default

People have been doing similar things on the HiSeq too - but the issue here isn't whether it's technically feasible to hack the kits, it's whether your application will be able to cope with the awful sequencing quality of anything over 300bp in length. If you routinely use the 600 cycle kits, you'll know how the R2 drop off is - so imagine what this is going to be like after 700 cycles...

But see also: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3673215/
Bukowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2019, 08:02 AM   #3
JasperGeh
Member
 
Location: Hanover, Germany

Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 13
Default

Thanks, what they did in the paper looks really cool. And yes, I am aware of the decreasing quality, but a small amount of data (after filtering) helps us more than none, in this case...
JasperGeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2019, 08:07 AM   #4
GenoMax
Senior Member
 
Location: East Coast USA

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,909
Default

Have you considered using nanopore sequencing if you need long(er) reads? No hacking of sequencer needed.
GenoMax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2019, 08:36 AM   #5
JasperGeh
Member
 
Location: Hanover, Germany

Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 13
Default

Not for this, as it's an antibody library and we need a single paired read with low error rate to cover one fragment. Hacking it will probably be
JasperGeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2019, 03:12 AM   #6
nucacidhunter
Jafar Jabbari
 
Location: Melbourne

Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,217
Default

If you do not need high number of reads, PacBio CCS will be a good option as it will cover the whole fragment length with very high accuracy.
nucacidhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
600, cycle count, miseq

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO