SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > 454 Pyrosequencing



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Maximum number of cycles from 300-cycle MiSeq kit... ECO Illumina/Solexa 13 11-09-2012 04:51 AM
Number of PCR How many PCR cycles to enrich adapter-modified DNA fragments MGH Man Sample Prep / Library Generation 5 07-26-2010 05:15 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-01-2014, 04:58 AM   #1
petralutra
Junior Member
 
Location: Czech Rep

Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1
Question different PCR cycle number for different microbiomes?

Hi,
I'm doing 16S amplicon pyrosequencing of oral and vaginal microbiome in wild mice. Samples have low DNA concentration (between 0.0001 and 0.5 ng/ul based on qPCR with 16S fusion primers; Qubit values are ca 10-fold higher). I would like to use the smallest possible number of PCR cycles to avoid biases, contamination etc. Vaginal samples have 10-100x lower DNA concentration than oral samples. Would it be ok to use different PCR cycle number for O and V if I plan to compare them? I can get nice bands on gel with 34 cycles for O and 38 for V samples using Kapa hifi (there is a paper on house mouse microbiome where they had to use even 44 cycles).

There are also quite big differences between particular samples so I'm even thinking of dividing them into 3-4 categories (according Cp in qPCR) and amplify them with different number of cycles. However, I did not find such approach in literature, so I'm not sure if it is ok? Better approach would be to dilute samples to similar concentrations and to use the same number of PCR cycles, but considering very low concentrations of my samples I really don't want to do that .

Many thanks for your opinions!
petralutra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2014, 06:58 AM   #2
scott.yourstone
Junior Member
 
Location: North Carolina

Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1
Default

You might want to check out this paper where each original DNA template gets a unique tag (similar to barcoding) prior to PCR and sequencing. After PCR and sequencing reads with the same tag can be grouped (because they come from the same template molecule). A single consensus sequence can be built from each group thereby reducing both sequencing error and PCR bias.

http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/...meth.2634.html

I know that a lab here at UNC has been using this protocol on lung microbiome samples where DNA concentration is also very low.
scott.yourstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO