![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Common elements within two set of miRNAs | Giorgio C | Bioinformatics | 1 | 01-05-2012 10:35 AM |
PubMed: Deep sequencing of microRNA precursors reveals extensive 3' end modification. | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 08-20-2011 12:02 AM |
way to normalize copy number data for small RNAs/miRNAs? | vebaev | Bioinformatics | 2 | 03-28-2011 03:18 AM |
Can you really see miRNAs on gels before PCR amplification | fisher | Illumina/Solexa | 3 | 07-27-2010 07:37 PM |
PubMed: Prediction of novel miRNAs and associated target genes in Glycine max. | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 03-05-2010 03:00 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Res.
Location: Plovdiv, Bulgaria Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 110
|
![]()
Dear all,
I'm trying to estimate the all reads count that are mapped to a specific precursor. I have done it my using bowtie with no mistmaches -v 0 But in some papers and tools I see that thay allowed 1 mistmache?! I compared the results in both way. Most of the counts are similar but for some miRNAs thay are doubled like in mir143 bellow: with 1 mistmach mapping: miR-143 - 4,697,060 miR-10b - 520,833 with 0 mistmach mapping: mir-143 - 1,976,574 mir-10b - 501,099 So which is the right way? I thought it should be with 0 mistmaches since non specific tags can align when mistmaches occure but some people do it? And if I want to estimate diff.expression I should know which method is most relevant? Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: East Coast, US Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 177
|
![]()
vebaev,
a straightforward way to check is to look at the alignments in any genomics viewer. It will tell you exactly which base(s) are not perfectly aligned for these genes. I believe some people allow one mismatch to accommodate sequencing errors or SNPs. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|