![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Samtools "is recognized as '*'" "truncated file" error | axiom7 | Bioinformatics | 3 | 11-26-2014 03:53 AM |
suitable tools for hetero SNP/INDEL discovery? | shuang | Bioinformatics | 0 | 10-04-2011 09:18 AM |
The position file formats ".clocs" and "_pos.txt"? Ist there any difference? | elgor | Illumina/Solexa | 0 | 06-27-2011 08:55 AM |
"Systems biology and administration" & "Genome generation: no engineering allowed" | seb567 | Bioinformatics | 0 | 05-25-2010 01:19 PM |
SEQanswers second "publication": "How to map billions of short reads onto genomes" | ECO | Literature Watch | 0 | 06-30-2009 12:49 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Location: IL Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 100
|
![]()
I'm using BWA-SW+Samtools to analyze SNP/INDEL of Sanger sequencing data. My samples may contain heterozygotes.. but not sure yet.
Can anyone give me an example of what "hetero SNP/INDEL" looks like in an alignment output from BWA-SW and a pileup output from Samtools? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: St. Louis Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 535
|
![]()
Not sure if alignment will tell you that, but if you use SAMtools pileup the output in column 4 will tell you if it's a heterozygous or homozygous call (following this code:http://biocorp.ca/IUB.php). If you use mpileup than if AC1=1 it's heterozygous and if AC1=2 it's homozygous (for a single individual), or you can look at the GT filed in the last column (0/1 or 0|1 is heterozygous and 1/1 or 1|1 is homozygous).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Location: IL Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 100
|
![]()
Thanks for the great information.
However, how to interpretate when AC1=2, but GT=0/1? Below is an example from my output. #CHROM POS ID REF ALT QUAL FILTER INFO FORMAT 5128_RF1-1_RN1.bam chr_8 50762920 . T C 4.77 . DP=1;AF1=1;AC1=2;DP4=0,0,0,1;MQ=60;FQ=-30 GT:PL:GQ 0/1:33,3,0:3 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Location: St. Louis Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 535
|
![]()
That's a weird situation because you have 1 read, so I'm pretty sure the normal rules don't apply. Do you ever see that with 2 or more reads?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Location: IL Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 100
|
![]()
I only pile upped 1 Sanger read at a time. Below is the actual full output for this sequence. A similar situation happens on the last INDEL, too. I do notice such confusion usually happens on a SNP with low QUAL.
How do I retrieve correct SNP/INDEL from such outputs? Or any other solution? #CHROM POS ID REF ALT QUAL FILTER INFO FORMAT 5128.bam chr_8 50762920 . T C 4.77 . DP=1;AF1=1;AC1=2;DP4=0,0,0,1;MQ=60;FQ=-30 GT:PL:GQ 0/1:33,3,0:3 chr_8 50763047 . T C 26 . DP=1;AF1=1;AC1=2;DP4=0,0,0,1;MQ=60;FQ=-30 GT:PL:GQ 1/1:56,3,0:6 chr_8 50763143 . T A 26 . DP=1;AF1=1;AC1=2;DP4=0,0,0,1;MQ=60;FQ=-30 GT:PL:GQ 1/1:56,3,0:6 chr_8 50763248 . G A 26 . DP=1;AF1=1;AC1=2;DP4=0,0,0,1;MQ=60;FQ=-30 GT:PL:GQ 1/1:56,3,0:6 chr_8 50763265 . G T 26 . DP=1;AF1=1;AC1=2;DP4=0,0,0,1;MQ=60;FQ=-30 GT:PL:GQ 1/1:56,3,0:6 chr_8 50763559 . c cG 3.81 . INDEL;DP=1;AF1=1;AC1=2;DP4=0,0,0,1;MQ=60;FQ=-37.5 GT:PL:GQ 0/1:39,3,0:4 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Location: St. Louis Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 535
|
![]()
Oh, I see. I haven't looked at Sanger sequencing in this way before so I'm not sure if relying on the quality scores is a good way to determine heterozygous from homozygous.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|