![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Insert size != Fragment size? | Boel | Bioinformatics | 6 | 12-12-2013 09:28 AM |
TruSeq and NEBNext RNA primer dimers around 100bp | SDGenomics | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 0 | 09-20-2013 10:42 AM |
Insert size | billstevens | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 3 | 04-16-2012 04:33 AM |
About Insert, Insert size and MIRA mates.file | aarthi.talla | 454 Pyrosequencing | 1 | 08-01-2011 02:37 PM |
insert size | polystone | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 0 | 05-04-2010 11:07 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: USA Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Hello community,
I currently have a designed custom amplicon panel with insert sizes around 100bp which for the most part work fine. I'm noticing some variability in that the longer insert sizes seem to have a consistently higher coverage than the shorter ones (lower vs upper quartile). Unfortunately qPCR and dPCR are not options due to the size of the panel. Platform: MiSeq Kit/Adapters: TruSeq Before I redesign my primers, any advice? Is it possible to reliably reduce the insert size to ~50bp or lower and if so, what complications or design considerations are there? I've already lengthened the primer+adapters to somewhat already diminished fragment size. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
fragment size, insert size, miseq, truseq |
Thread Tools | |
|
|