|
|
|
|
|||||||
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Trinity transcriptome assembly | upendra_35 | De novo discovery | 11 | 06-04-2015 10:34 AM |
| De novo assembly using Trinity | ankitarathore | RNA Sequencing | 5 | 10-28-2014 09:03 AM |
| de novo assembly using Trinity versus Velvet-Oases | Nol | De novo discovery | 8 | 10-26-2013 12:56 PM |
| get wrong when I do de novo assembly by trinity for two 22.6G reads file | taoxiang180 | Bioinformatics | 4 | 08-20-2012 10:52 PM |
| Trinity - de novo transcriptome assembler | samanta | De novo discovery | 2 | 07-29-2011 01:19 PM |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
01-13-2014, 02:52 AM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Location: UK Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 14
|
de novo transcriptome Trinity Assembly concatenamers
Hi all,
I got a de novo transcriptome Trinity assembly of a drosophila species which is evolutionary far from other sequenced species (closest one is pseudoobscura, but 10% divergency at least). In my assembly I find many big contigs which consist of concatenamers of genomically close genes (see attached fig, my contig is the red stripe aligned to pseusdoobscura genome). I suppose this is not due to genome contamination since I always find intact, full spliced ORFs inside these contigs. I also suppose that this is generated by the fact that some genes have overlapping UTRs. Does someone has already faced this situation and has an idea how to overcome this assembly problem? Thanks! |
|
|
|
01-13-2014, 04:25 AM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Location: Budapest Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 329
|
Yes, we have similar errors. We used genome guided Trinity to minimize this problem. Pasa also can help. You can read this
|
|
|
|
|
01-14-2014, 02:34 AM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Location: UK Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 14
|
Hi TiborNagy, thanks for your reply...
Can you please tell me how efficient is this method? What the percentage-ish of resolution of the "multigene" contigs? Cheers |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
