![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PubMed: Efficient storage of high throughput DNA sequencing data using reference-base | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 09-07-2011 03:00 AM |
Denovo before and after an alignment | scami | Bioinformatics | 0 | 05-13-2011 06:11 AM |
Need help on soap denovo | sundar | De novo discovery | 4 | 11-29-2010 04:03 AM |
Velvet denovo | bair | Bioinformatics | 4 | 08-26-2010 01:10 AM |
velvet denovo | bioenvisage | De novo discovery | 2 | 02-11-2010 08:35 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: US Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 54
|
![]()
I remember reading a paper talking about how denovo sequencing is useful even on known reference. Because each people's genome is slightly different. I am trying to find that paper again but couldn't anymore.
I have some exome sequencing illumina data, I am wondering if it is worth it to do denovo sequencing in this case. What is your take on this subject? Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Location: Eesti Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 37
|
![]()
I guess you mean human genome... well I work with almost exclusively with bacteria but I do not see any advantage in de novo sequencing over reference mapping. you have to be really sure that you expect substantial re-arragements in genome of interest. Which might be easily case with various strains of bacteria ... in human genomes, I am not expert on this field but I doubt...
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Location: Boston area Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 747
|
![]()
There are regions of structural variation which are not captured in the reference genome for any species.
One approach is to first do reference mapping, then assemble what doesn't map. Similarly, localized assembly of regions you know are dodgy -- such as if a high frequency of only one side of a paired end read mapping next to that region. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|