![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TrueSeq PCR free POOR LIGATION efficiencies | Degraz | Illumina/Solexa | 3 | 04-08-2015 06:03 AM |
TruSeq DNA PCR-free vs NANO DNA kit | mbk0asis | Illumina/Solexa | 8 | 05-17-2014 09:15 AM |
PCR-Free Libraries & Bioinformatic PCR Duplicate detection? | aeonsim | Bioinformatics | 3 | 10-23-2013 02:36 PM |
The NEXTflex™ PCR-Free DNA Sequencing Kit Reduces Bias in NGS Library Prep | Bioo Scientific | Vendor Forum | 10 | 12-20-2012 08:10 AM |
bias in merging sequence data? | quinne5 | RNA Sequencing | 0 | 11-01-2012 10:17 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: planet Earth Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Hi All,
We are starting a new sequencing project of human DNA samples. Part of our sample was already sequenced using Illumina TrueSeq PCR-free kit. Now, it turned out that part of the new samples does not qualify for PCR-free protocol and we were suggested to switch them to TrueSeq Nano protocol. In addition, we have been advised that PCR-free protocol could have a big failure rate during library prep currently, up to 15%. The issue seems to be connected to changes in kit chemistry and affects many labs worldwide. However, I am a little bit worried about the possible extent of batch bias arising when processing/merging data from two different protocols (PCR-free and Nano). Does anybody here have this kind of experience? Thank you in advance! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|