![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Optimal De Novo Assembly Parameters | JVGen | Illumina/Solexa | 4 | 10-07-2016 06:03 AM |
de novo assembly strategy for mid size genome and illumina reads ? | moistplus | Bioinformatics | 3 | 04-19-2016 07:07 AM |
Optimum insert size for De-novo transcriptome assembly | tellsparck | Bioinformatics | 1 | 02-17-2015 12:17 PM |
What insert size for velveth (1.2.10) with 2 sets of reads with diff. insert sizes? | Genomics101 | Bioinformatics | 4 | 02-07-2014 12:41 PM |
mate pair insert size variation and de novo assembly | Mark | Introductions | 2 | 10-13-2012 01:48 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: USA Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 18
|
![]()
In the past, I have had reasonable success with de novo assembly of non-model eukaryotes with insert sizes of ~300 bp, using 100 bp PE and Trinity for assembly.
With 150 bp PE reads and the current version of Trinity, is a mean insert size of ~300 bp still generally optimal, or would a longer mean insert size likely benefit the assembly? (RNA will be poly-a selected, with libraries constructed using the NEBNext® Ultra™ Directional kit.) Thanks in advance! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|