![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
minimum and maximum CNV size by Read Depth? | eleven | Bioinformatics | 2 | 05-29-2013 02:36 AM |
minimum depth of coverage for transfrag extension | apadr007 | Bioinformatics | 6 | 05-15-2012 07:23 AM |
Maximum possible coverage depth | junfeng | Bioinformatics | 1 | 01-18-2012 09:54 AM |
What's maximum depth and minimum depth? | slny | Bioinformatics | 0 | 03-17-2011 11:13 AM |
Depth of coverage variation in RNA Seq | jay | RNA Sequencing | 19 | 08-12-2010 12:26 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Rome Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 3
|
![]()
*or maximum
We are studying structural variation in several plant genomes Illmumina pair-end DNA re-sequencing, and noticed that the number of deletions in some samples (PINDEL) drops significantly. After having boldly calculated the depth as [number of reads] x mean read length / genome size we noticed that in these samples the depth was way lower (around 10 folds on an average of 50). I was wondering if there is some lower or higher limit in a sample depth to start considering an adulterated result. Thanks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
coverage, depth, illumina, pairend, structural variation |
Thread Tools | |
|
|