![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to compare single-end vs paired-end RNA-seq data? | mick | Bioinformatics | 0 | 01-23-2018 08:44 PM |
Single end read with paired end reads | tahamasoodi | Bioinformatics | 2 | 01-16-2016 08:46 AM |
Confusion about single end vs paired end read output on Illumina HiSeq | acidcoated | Illumina/Solexa | 1 | 03-19-2015 09:56 AM |
searching 454 (single read) + Illumina paired-end or matepair data | boetsie | General | 0 | 10-04-2010 02:45 AM |
Difference in paired-end and single-end read ? | darshan | Bioinformatics | 1 | 10-01-2009 12:44 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Postdoc Cancer Bioinformatics
Location: Olso, Norway Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 17
|
![]()
Dear All,
I am new to GATK and very confused regarding "Read Groups". I have fastq files and I will like to add read groups to the files. This is what I have understood and please do let me know where I am correct or wrong. Case1: Single-End data Let's say I have 2 samples S1, S2 sequenced in 3 lanes. This will give rise to 3 fastq files, i.e. S1_L1.fastq.gz, S1_L2.fastq.gz, S1_L3.fastq.gz, S2_L1.fastq.gz, S2_L2.fastq.gz and S2_L3.fastq.gz Now what I have understood from reading numerous blogs and GATK forum that the read group ID should be unique and is used to correction for the variation between reads of the same sample from different lanes. Like we can find if the there is something wrong with a single lane Hence, it should look like following RGID=S1_L1 PL=illumina SM=S1 RGID=S1_L2 PL=illumina SM=S1 RGID=S1_L3 PL=illumina SM=S1 RGID=S2_L1 PL=illumina SM=S2 RGID=S1_L2 PL=illumina SM=S2 RGID=S1_L3 PL=illumina SM=S2 Is there some other application of read group id? Case2: Paired-End data How will we define read groups if the data was paired-end, such as S1_L1_R1.fastq.gz, S1_L2_R1.fastq.gz, S1_L3_R1.fastq.gz, S2_L1_R1.fastq.gz, S2_L2_R1.fastq.gz and S2_L3_R1.fastq.gz S1_L1_R2.fastq.gz, S1_L2_R2.fastq.gz, S1_L3_R2.fastq.gz, S2_L1_R2.fastq.gz, S2_L2_R2.fastq.gz and S2_L3_R2.fastq.gz |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Location: East Coast USA Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,091
|
![]()
This is hardly ever the case. Now-a-days technical part of sequencing has become almost perfect. If a lane had some problem (e.g. a bubble during sequencing) your sequencing provider should not release that data in the first place.
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
gatk, ngs, picard markduplicates, readgroups |
Thread Tools | |
|
|