![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
poor postcap yield-Kapa lib prep | thiNGS | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 7 | 10-24-2014 08:14 PM |
Innaccurate Kapa Quant Standards | Daytwa | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 1 | 02-11-2014 01:09 PM |
Kapa Quant Kit-- Roche light cycler | sanju0891 | 454 Pyrosequencing | 0 | 05-07-2012 02:13 AM |
FLX vs Titanium, Lib-L vs Lib-A, Amplicon Libraries = confusion | SeqTruth | 454 Pyrosequencing | 4 | 03-03-2012 01:08 PM |
Has anyone used r-quant? | quix | RNA Sequencing | 0 | 08-24-2010 01:56 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Texas Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 4
|
![]()
Hello. I am new here. I have a naive question. When we make series dilution for kapa lib quant.
1) Will it make big difference if dilute the lib using H2O vs 10mM tris PH8.0 w 0.05% tween-20 ? 2) will kapa conc typically higher than the Qubit conc (lib w Illumina p5/p7 sequence primer) ? 3) vetex to mix should be better than Pipet up/down. In the case using Pipet up/down. How many times up/down should be sufficient? Thank you all so much |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Location: Germany Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10
|
![]()
For PCR-free libs kapa quant kit makes sense, as qubit will not deliver accurate results. he different buffers for diluting should not have a big effect for what I can say. 5 times pipetting up and down should be sufficient.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Location: Texas Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 4
|
![]()
Thank you so much, Seq198
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|