![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Inner distance value for TopHat / Proper mapping with RNA-Seq PE data | ocs | Bioinformatics | 6 | 11-27-2011 11:10 AM |
TopHat Error: you must set the mean inner distance between mates with -r? | xhuister | Bioinformatics | 2 | 02-24-2011 09:07 AM |
tophat -r mate inner distance option | ssseq | Bioinformatics | 2 | 01-10-2011 06:15 AM |
Tophat mean inner distance error for SOLID data | repinementer | Bioinformatics | 0 | 10-28-2010 07:58 PM |
tophat -r mate inner distance | mgogol | RNA Sequencing | 0 | 09-11-2009 02:41 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Memphis Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Hello all,
I'm currently working on RNA-seq analysis using Galaxy. The dataset which I'm using is a paired-end data from BodyMap Project. For the BodyMap Project, inner mean distance of 110 is recommended for TopHat. I'm trying to put different values and see the results, but the results aren't as expected. If I'm right, I should be getting the best alignment with the recommended inner mean distance. In this case, I've tried 50, 110, 300 and 400. But there is not much difference in the alignment summary with the given set of input. Why is that? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Vienna Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 123
|
![]()
Hi Priyam21292,
TopHat estimates the mean inner distance itself. It uses - if given - the input value as a starting point for the optimisation. In case you provide this parameter, the computing is faster and a bit more precise. Cheers, Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
galaxy, inner mean distance, tophat |
Thread Tools | |
|
|