![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
comparing sequencing runs across Illumina machines | Reid | Illumina/Solexa | 7 | 04-25-2018 03:13 PM |
Two Miseq runs - different quality | tomlodz | Illumina/Solexa | 12 | 02-26-2018 02:17 PM |
MiSeq Carry-over contamination between runs | Harlon | Illumina/Solexa | 58 | 09-07-2017 08:00 AM |
Demultiplexing MiSeq Runs with Miseq Reporter | cinimod | Illumina/Solexa | 2 | 12-17-2014 10:58 PM |
Comparing the quality of de novo assembly from two runs' data | NGS group | Bioinformatics | 3 | 05-10-2013 09:17 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Cambridgeshire Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 2
|
![]()
Hi, I have about 4 different MiSeq runs i have data for. I have pipelined the fastq files through bowtie-samtools-cuffdiff to compare cDNA libraries of different samples. A thought that just occured to me is some of the times i loaded a 15pM library and sometimes i loaded a 8pM library into the MiSeq cartridge (150bp v3) .
Does anyone know if its still possible to combine the data. Does the data get normalized against total number of reads? Thanks, Will |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: East Coast USA Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,087
|
![]()
If you are using DESeq2/edgeR then they will account for differences in the total number of reads. You could downsample the data to similar levels as an option.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
bowtie, cuffdiff, loading concentration, miseq, rna seq |
Thread Tools | |
|
|