Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • HiSeq 3000/4000 2x150 data

    Hello wise ones,

    Has anyone out there had any paired-end long read experience. We'd love to see the run data (Q30 graphs, etc).

    S

  • #2
    I do not believe there are any 3000's/4000s out there in the wild yet.

    Comment


    • #3
      I would not expect any useful data from "Q30 graphs"; my understanding is that Illumina is currently planning mandatory Q-score quantization on the new platforms, as they do on NextSeq, which will render the quality scores mostly useless.

      Comment


      • #4
        There are some examples of HiSeq 4000 data in public area on BaseSpace. Don't know if they are long read since the description does not say anything specific.

        Comment


        • #5
          Checked BaseSpace already. Just 2x76.

          Comment


          • #6
            We just received our HiSeq 4000 today and it will be a couple more months until we can get validation runs going.

            Comment


            • #7
              Would you be open to listing your HiSeq 4000 on Genohub.com? There are many researchers hoping to get access. Are access to flow cells still a limiting factor?

              Comment


              • #8
                @scrosby: UC Davis lab had posted some 3000 data. http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=58353

                Comment


                • #9
                  As I believe many companies are still undergoing 4000 validation testing, but so far the graphs on 4000 raw data that i have seen are all pretty nice and stable beside the duplication problem everyone has already mentioned.
                  And by the way I think Q20 is enough to determine the quality of the sequence in most cases.
                  Last edited by QazSeDc; 06-04-2015, 12:39 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Increased number of duplicate reads, preferential amplification of small fragments and shorter sequencing libraries?

                    Is this worth 900K?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by QazSeDc View Post
                      And by the way I think Q20 is enough to determine the quality of the sequence in most cases.
                      ...no, absolutely not. That's like determining the flavor of a bottle of wine by reading the label.

                      Originally posted by NextGenSeq
                      Increased number of duplicate reads, preferential amplification of small fragments and shorter sequencing libraries?

                      Is this worth 900K?
                      Not to me; I'd prefer the 2500, except when you need immense volume of short-insert overlapping fragments. For example, a time-and-space-series deep metagenome, or when sequencing a country's population...

                      Comment

                      Latest Articles

                      Collapse

                      • seqadmin
                        Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
                        by seqadmin


                        The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
                        Yesterday, 07:01 AM
                      • seqadmin
                        Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
                        by seqadmin


                        Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
                        04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

                      ad_right_rmr

                      Collapse

                      News

                      Collapse

                      Topics Statistics Last Post
                      Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
                      0 responses
                      39 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post seqadmin  
                      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
                      0 responses
                      41 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post seqadmin  
                      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
                      0 responses
                      35 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post seqadmin  
                      Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
                      0 responses
                      55 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post seqadmin  
                      Working...
                      X