Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Retrieving mismatch details from tophat

    Hi, all,

    Summary: How can I see the details of the mismatch locations for tophat alignments?

    Details:

    In the SAM output of a tophat run, there are two potential sources I'm aware of for finding information about the alignment details for each entry.

    1) The CIGAR mandatory field, which is generally either xM, where x is the number of aligned bases, or xMyNzM, where x + z is the number of combined bases, and y is the length of the intron.

    2) The MD:Z optional field, which contains a more detailed representation that indicates exactly which pieces of the reference match were altered or elided in the read. (There is also an NM:i field which tells the number of mismatches, but not where they fall.)

    In bowtie output, both of these are present. But in my tophat output, MD is consistently absent, and I have only the much less informative CIGAR field (and yet, the SAM spec does provide for more detail in the CIGAR field, but it is optional, and neither bowtie nor tophat incorporates X/= tokens).

    I could write a script that chews over the original genome and the output alignments and reconstructs this information, but since I know the internal bowtie output must be generating this information at least for the matches that don't involve exons, I'm hoping that there's a way to have tophat provide it to me directly.

    Anybody know how to solve this problem? I'm pretty new to this, so I could well be missing something obvious (a supplemental tool, a flag, etc).

    Thanks!

    -John

  • #2
    The samtools calmd command will calculate the proper md flags given a sam file and the genome in fasta format.

    link

    If I remember correctly it runs much faster if the sam file has been sorted previous to running calmd, look at the samtools sort command for how to do that.

    Historically the CIGAR field only dealt with insertion deletions, both matches and mismatches are designated with a 'M' in the CIGAR string. That seems to have been changed in a more recent revision of the format, but I don't know of any programs which have implemented it yet.

    Comment


    • #3
      Perfect, thanks @hesterj! That'll save me a lot of time.

      And no worries on the sorting, my downstream processing depends on that in any case.

      -John

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
        by seqadmin


        Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
        04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
      • seqadmin
        Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
        by seqadmin


        Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
        03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
      0 responses
      31 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
      0 responses
      52 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X