![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
bcl2fastq 2.0 barcode mismatch option | ruggedtextile | Bioinformatics | 2 | 09-09-2014 01:32 AM |
Why does Cufflinks with mask (-M) option have lower FPKM for mRNA genes? | sterding | RNA Sequencing | 2 | 08-23-2014 06:46 AM |
Mask x number of bases WITHIN sequence prior to alignment | SEQond | Bioinformatics | 3 | 08-02-2012 06:16 AM |
Mask x number of bases WITHIN sequence prior to alignment | SEQond | RNA Sequencing | 0 | 07-26-2012 02:10 AM |
CASAVA 1.8 --use-bases-mask | aggp11 | Illumina/Solexa | 4 | 02-02-2012 06:34 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Boston, MA Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 4
|
![]()
Hi all,
A colleague in the lab asked me to demultiplex a recent NextSeq run. She loaded it with samples prepared from two libraries. One library had single indices and one had dual indices. She also prepared two sample sheets for me to use. I was able to use the sample sheet for the single-index samples successfully but running bcl2fastq again, this time using the sample sheet for the dual-index samples, did not work (all reads ended up in two large "Undetermined" fastq files). Someone suggested I use the --use-bases-mask option for bcl2fastq but I am not entirely sure how to set it up. The information in the RunInfo.xml file is as follows: Code:
... <Reads> <Read Number="1" NumCycles="147" IsIndexedRead="N" /> <Read Number="2" NumCycles="12" IsIndexedRead="Y" /> <Read Number="3" NumCycles="12" IsIndexedRead="Y" /> <Read Number="4" NumCycles="147" IsIndexedRead="N" /> </Reads> <FlowcellLayout LaneCount="4" SurfaceCount="2" SwathCount="3" TileCount="12" SectionPerLane="3" LanePerSection="2"> <TileSet TileNamingConvention="FiveDigit"> <Tiles> <Tile>1_11101</Tile> <Tile>1_21101</Tile> ... Code:
--use-bases-mask Y147,I8nnnn,I8nnnn,Y147 My questions: 1) Is using --use-bases-mask the best approach? 2) I read somewhere on here that the sample sheets can be combined so that bcl2fastq only needs to be run once -- is that a preferable approach? By the way, for all of this I am using bcl2fastq v2.17.1.14. Thank you in advance, any advice would be appreciated! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Location: California Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 198
|
![]() Quote:
Code:
--create-fastq-for-index-reads |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Location: USA Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 184
|
![]()
Did you remember to reverse complement the index2s?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Location: Boston, MA Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 4
|
![]()
Thank you for suggestion!
I went back to the lab tech and asked her to take a critical look at the indices. She regenerated the file using the Illumina Experiment Manager and now it worked. I believe she messed up the file she gave me the first time around... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
barcode, bcl2fastq, demultiplexing, nextseq |
Thread Tools | |
|
|