![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GATK UnifiedGenotyper not calling any variants | krobasky | Bioinformatics | 7 | 10-25-2012 11:19 PM |
Trouble with making indel calls using UnifiedGenotyper | oiiio | Bioinformatics | 0 | 11-04-2011 01:55 PM |
GATK update changes UnifiedGenotyper output | doc.ramses | Bioinformatics | 2 | 10-18-2011 07:41 AM |
GATK UnifiedGenotyper calling way too many SNPs in vcf | swbarnes2 | Bioinformatics | 0 | 08-17-2011 02:33 PM |
missing header information in bam cause GATK unifiedgenotyper fail | foxyg | Bioinformatics | 3 | 11-11-2010 10:37 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Chicago Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2
|
![]()
I am working with 454 single-end long-read data for a region on chr6, using hg19 and dbSNP build 135 as references. GATK Unifiedgenotyper with the option -glm INDEL returns no calls on realigned+recalibrated bam file and on recalibrated bam file. Using additional arguments, such as --output_mode EMIT_ALL_SITES, or setting call/emit thresholds, does not make a difference, either.
Earlier posts on this forum (http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15634) indicate that a high sequencing error rate may be the cause. So I wonder: 1. If resetting the sequencing error rate is the solution, how do I do it? Is this error rate reported in the bam file? 2. Are there other ways of tweaking GATK to deal with this problem? Thanks for your help! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Graz, Austria Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 219
|
![]()
I once tried to twaek GATK to output Indels in 454 data, but I think they turned that utility off as soon as you specify the PL:454 (or maybe it was PL:ROCHE, I don't remember) tag. In case you find a solution, I'd be happy to it
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Location: Chicago Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2
|
![]()
In case ulz_peter and others are interested, it turns out that GATK UG does not make indel calls for 454 data.
I also posted the same question here: http://getsatisfaction.com/gsa/topic...#reply_7912928 (btw, this is a pretty good place to have GATK-related questions answered) Now the wiki page for GATK UG clearly states this limitation: http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsa/wi...fied_genotyper Hope this helps. I'm trying samtools for indel calling now. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
gatk, indel calling, unifiedgenotyper |
Thread Tools | |
|
|