![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Detecting low frequency mutations - GATK | spreeth84 | Bioinformatics | 3 | 02-13-2015 04:26 AM |
Low frequency variant caller for any ploidy level | me_myself_andI | Bioinformatics | 16 | 04-21-2014 08:39 AM |
PubMed: Resequencing of 200 human exomes identifies an excess of low-frequency non-sy | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 1 | 12-02-2010 08:04 AM |
samtools pileup for low frequency alleles? | greigite | Bioinformatics | 0 | 03-02-2010 04:43 PM |
MAQ and indel detection | fadista | Bioinformatics | 1 | 09-03-2008 01:07 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: Cardiff Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 19
|
![]()
Hi,
Can anyone recommend software particularly suited for very low frequency indel detection as might be applied to ultra-deep targeted sequencing (UDT-seq) datasets where coverage exceeds 1000x? Choices seem limited. Am getting the impression scripting around samtools mpileup output might be the most robust strategy. Any thoughts anyone? Many thanks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Location: Vancouver, BC Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6
|
![]()
I am also interested in indel annotation, if you find any good solutions please post.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Location: USA Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 482
|
![]()
I agree .. you would need to parse the pileup file and then use your own thresholds. Perhaps use the simple common filters and start with that indel list.
For annotation, seattleSEQ (http://snp.gs.washington.edu/SeattleSeqAnnotation/) is an option and so is TREAT (shameless self plug - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22088845) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Location: USA Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 482
|
![]() Quote:
http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18541 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|