![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Quality Score: FastQC vs Illumina | ericguo | Illumina/Solexa | 8 | 10-22-2015 05:08 AM |
Fastqc results small RNA run | frymor | Bioinformatics | 4 | 10-24-2013 11:21 AM |
fastqc - Multiplex barcodes or other adaptors polluting reads? | jimineep | Illumina/Solexa | 4 | 09-21-2011 07:15 AM |
Need help for FastQC results. Thanks!! | byou678 | Bioinformatics | 18 | 08-23-2011 02:53 PM |
FASTQC for checking quality of 120 bp reads | madsaan | Bioinformatics | 4 | 06-07-2011 12:17 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: ma Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 46
|
![]()
We have a set of illumina paired-end RNA seq 50 bp data. The plot of per base sequnece quality is fine (I think), but the plot of Kmer Content looks very weird. I want to have some suggestions about what is wrong in this data. Does it suggest there is an adaptor contamination? Will trimming adaptors help? How should I find the sequence of these adaptors?
Thanks a lot. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Location: Boston Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 65
|
![]()
The pink peak is CGTCT and the red is GTCTG, so I would guess you have the sequence CGTCTG in positions 15-20. Likewise, the it seems like the sequence, TATCTCGTATG in positions 38-48.
Somewhere on the SeqAnswers site has been posted Illumina paired end adaptors. I found CGTCT in a few 5' Illumina adaptors, however, the CGTCT in the adaptors is always followed by a T and not a G. Also, TCTCG is found in a couple of 3' Illumina adaptors, but it is followed by AGCATAC. So, I am not sure as to what the peaks you have are showing, and the adaptor sequences I have come from 2008. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|