The title of this forum should be changed to BGISEQ or MGISEQ

chengang · 12-09-2017, 07:03 PM

Maybe, MGISEQ is better.

ECO · 04-03-2019, 09:33 AM

Done! Two years late!

capsicum · 09-12-2019, 02:44 PM

For what it's worth (there's very littel traffic here anyway):

I think this should be renamed back to Complete Genomics, and a new forum should be created for MGISEQ instruments. Most of the questions/answers here are either 1) not relevant to MGI or CG, or 2) they're CG-data/analysis specific questions. The MGI instruments have basically thrown away all the sequencing technology used by CG, and only the Nanoball/'clustering' method is retained. The instruments are quite different too.

Cheers,

Scott.

loafingnick · 10-21-2019, 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ECO

Done! Two years late!

I agree with you. Now the naming should be changed to DNBSEQ according to the company website.

https://en.mgitech.cn/product/Sequencer.html

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Gene id changed to XLOC... cuffmerge issue?	gtduarte	RNA Sequencing	2	01-25-2016 12:32 PM
Unsung heroes - Title borrowed from the included post	GenoMax	Core Facilities	0	08-24-2012 10:21 AM
Jobs forum structure changed.	ECO	Site Announcements	0	11-12-2009 10:55 PM
What's your suggestion to the paper title?	baohua100	General	2	07-02-2008 02:21 PM

12-09-2017, 07:03 PM	#1
chengang Junior Member Location: China Join Date: Feb 2014 Posts: 2	The title of this forum should be changed to BGISEQ or MGISEQ Maybe, MGISEQ is better.

04-03-2019, 09:33 AM	#2
ECO --Site Admin-- Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 1,358	Done! Two years late!

09-12-2019, 02:44 PM	#3
capsicum Member Location: Earth Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 13	For what it's worth (there's very littel traffic here anyway): I think this should be renamed back to Complete Genomics, and a new forum should be created for MGISEQ instruments. Most of the questions/answers here are either 1) not relevant to MGI or CG, or 2) they're CG-data/analysis specific questions. The MGI instruments have basically thrown away all the sequencing technology used by CG, and only the Nanoball/'clustering' method is retained. The instruments are quite different too. Cheers, Scott.