![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homemade TruSeq adapters | sebbaba | Illumina/Solexa | 2 | 09-09-2013 09:26 AM |
TruSeq / SPRIworks? | jlove | Illumina/Solexa | 10 | 07-23-2012 08:45 AM |
TruSeq adapter sequences | kirankm | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 4 | 05-10-2012 07:32 AM |
TruSeq v3 Cluster Kits with TruSeq SBS kits? | rgejman | Illumina/Solexa | 5 | 07-13-2011 11:33 AM |
Truseq | kathyglory | Introductions | 0 | 06-10-2011 02:39 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Location: USA Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 102
|
![]()
I have recently used TruSeq kit for making 8 of Brassica RNAseq libraries and after amplification (15 cycles) and running on the gel (1% Agarose) i found that 5 out of 8 libraries have a broader range of fragments (smear) compared to the rest of the 3 libraries. I don't know why and the only reason i can think of possible over-amplification. But if it is so why only 5 and not all 8 have this problem. Any help is appreciated.
I have attached the picture of the gel for easy understanding. Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,317
|
![]()
The picture you attach looks to my viewer (FoxIt pdf viewer) like it has been processed through some bizarre filter to make it look like a scanning electron micrograph. That is off-putting -- but also you don't give the marker sizes.
-- Phillip |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: Seattle, WA Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 87
|
![]()
You might want to try repurifying them with the beads.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Location: USA Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 102
|
![]()
Hi pmiguel, marker sizes added now.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|