SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > Metagenomics



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
pico green discrepancies schizosaccharomyces Sample Prep / Library Generation 5 10-17-2013 08:37 AM
Qubit vs Nanodrop discrepancies?? amylee86 General 1 07-10-2013 07:50 AM
tophat / bowtie mapping discrepancies vineeth_s Bioinformatics 3 06-10-2011 04:44 AM
Discrepancies between PicoGreen and qPCR in GA libraries fedora Sample Prep / Library Generation 3 08-25-2009 05:52 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-10-2013, 02:20 PM   #1
pmb0010
Junior Member
 
Location: USA

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5
Default Taxonomic assignment discrepancies between SILVA and GenBank databases

Hi All-

I have some metagenomic Illumina data that I am attempting to analyze. I am focusing on eukaryotes and have targeted the V9 hypervariable region. I am attempting to assign taxonomy to my representative set of OTU's for a data set. I was using the QIIME-compatible versions of the SILVA 108 release to assign taxonomy (the whole data set and not just the Eukaryote specific data set). I recently attempted to assigning taxonomy of my representative OTU sequences by blasting against NCBI remotely and then importing the blast report into MEGAN. I did both methods for the same data set and same file for the representative OTU's and noticed some discrepancies. Some discrepancies were understandable and were around the genus and species levels. However, other OTU's resulted in very concerning results. One OTU in particular was classified as an Annelid through the GenBank/MEGAN method, but was considered a Chordate when blasted against the SILVA database in QIIME. I would expect discrepancies as you get more specific in the classification (genus/species level) but I did not expect discrepancies so high up in the classification level.

I guess I am wondering if anyone else has attempted to compare or has looked at taxonomic assignments of Eukaryotes using different databases and how well the results matched up. Can anyone suggest why I am seeing such a large discrepancy in taxonomy for some of my samples?

I am fairly new to the metagenomic world and am attempting to figure out how to analyze my data. Any assistance will be greatly appreciated!
pmb0010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2013, 09:53 AM   #2
rhinoceros
Senior Member
 
Location: sub-surface moon base

Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 372
Default

Have you read the MEGAN manual? Especially the part where it explains how MEGAN assigns reads to taxa? Have you updated NCBI taxonomy in MEGAN? Have you considered that the GI-to-taxid file MEGAN uses is quite old? Hopefully this file will be updated come MEGAN5, or even better, if the author would disclose how the file is processed so we could always have the latest version..

Last edited by rhinoceros; 05-12-2013 at 09:59 AM.
rhinoceros is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO