Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > Sample Prep / Library Generation

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moderately Low Yield ChIP jazz710 Sample Prep / Library Generation 9 01-22-2015 10:18 AM
Inconsistent Yield With Nextera XT BigAlPal Illumina/Solexa 4 07-19-2014 12:39 AM
Nextera DNA library - low yield? sweetph3 Sample Prep / Library Generation 9 03-23-2014 03:03 AM
Low library yield Seqwork RNA Sequencing 2 03-06-2014 10:57 AM
Low yield with Ampure XP cleanup akbowser Sample Prep / Library Generation 5 08-27-2012 05:08 AM

Thread Tools
Old 11-21-2014, 05:47 AM   #1
Junior Member
Location: Canada

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1
Default Nextera XT low yield

I am using the XT Nextera kit with environmental samples. DNA was extracted and purified by phenol/chlo and column (to remove EDTA).
When I used the recommended DNA final quantity (1ng) I didn't get anything. If I used less than that, it was worst.
I have to increase the DNA amount a little bit (1,2ng final) and add one cycle to the PCR to get a pic with the correct size (around 1000b) for the MiSeq run. But I still have a low yield.
I purified the library with AmPure beats 0.5x.
Any advice to increase the yield? Maybe a way to remove degraded DNA before tagmentation? Is it possible to make a home-made PCR instead of the XT polymerase?
nicoT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2014, 05:34 AM   #2
Senior Member
Location: Bonn (Germany)

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 192

difficult to say why you got a low yield without seeing the whole protocol.
If the degraded DNA is leftover in the solution it will be tagmented, regardless of its length. Well, almost. Adey et al. (Genome Biology 2010) report that the smallest fragment that can be tagmented is ca. 40 bp. In our recent paper (Picelli et al., Genome Res 2014) we also saw that anything <100 bp is tagmented.
We are using KAPA HiFi non-HS kit for the PCR. Please take a look at the paper for the details.
I believe that (almost) any non-HS kit will work as long as you do a bit of optimization!
The XT Polymerase is just Phusion Polymerase, by the way. KAPA performs better, especially for GC-rich fragments.

you are concerned about adding a few extra PCR cycles but it shouldn´t make a big difference in the final quality of data. However, if you end up with a low-complexity library you need to solve the problem with the yield (maybe you are preferentially amplifying some fragments and losing others).

I hope this helps, good luck!
Simone78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2014, 11:17 AM   #3
Junior Member
Location: Oxford

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3

0.5 XP beads may be a little low, I would try at 0.85.
darwin142 is offline   Reply With Quote

xt nextera, yield

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO