SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how do i reduce misassemblies in spades? evolino Bioinformatics 0 10-30-2017 09:22 PM
Too much PhiX Shrek Illumina/Solexa 1 09-19-2017 04:07 AM
reduce N's in my assembly meriem Bioinformatics 1 12-20-2016 10:03 AM
less PhiX than you think? beardy_man Illumina/Solexa 1 11-08-2013 12:50 PM
V3 PhiX kthai Illumina/Solexa 0 04-01-2011 12:21 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-12-2018, 04:18 AM   #1
Gaetan
Junior Member
 
Location: Europe

Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 3
Default Reduce PhiX

Dear all,

I was wondering if there was any tool to help me reduce the PhiX% used in our NextSeq 500 runs? We run similar samples continuously, with "low" diversity as we enrich specific regions by hybrid capture. Instead of empirical & successive testings to reduce the PhiX%, can I guestimate the "ideal" PhiX% to add before reaching the slippery slope?
Thank you for your help.
Gaetan
Gaetan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2018, 07:02 AM   #2
GSviral
Member
 
Location: UK

Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 31
Default

Hi Gaetan,

For sequencing on the MiSeq at least I know there is a recommendation to use a 5% PhiX spike-in for low diversity libraries (dependent on which version of the MiSeq Control Software you are using, you'll have to look that up.)

When I sequenced on the NextSeq I also used a hybridisation/capture approach however this was exome capture and the diversity was fine so I used a 1% PhiX spike-in for QC purposes.

For your purposes, a 5% minimum PhiX spike-in would probably do the trick, but I may stand corrected if someone else chimes in.

Cheers!
GSviral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2018, 11:35 PM   #3
Gaetan
Junior Member
 
Location: Europe

Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 3
Default

Hello,

Thank you for your quick answer!

Unfortunately, I cannot test right down to 5% as my samples are way to precious to risk a failed run because of low diversity.

So there no tools/tests to gauge the diversity based on my collected data that could help me to reduce the "wasted" output in sequencing "too much" PhiX?

I could safely slowly reduce the PhiX% each run until I see a deterioration in quality metrics but this empirical testing sounds like a waste of time if I am far off...

Thank you in advance!

Cheers
Gaetan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2018, 12:27 AM   #4
GSviral
Member
 
Location: UK

Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 31
Default

Hi Gaetan,

Yeah it's always a bother when working with precious samples and NGS! I took a quick look and found this from August 2018:

http://emea.support.illumina.com/bul...ow-divers.html

The NextSeq guidelines for PhiX spike-ins for low diversity libraries is 10% - 50%. I would be relatively confident that a 10% spike-in would be a good starting point. If you are still hesitant, increase that to 15% - 20%.


For your other question - unfortunately I am not aware of any tool to deduce diversity I'm afraid. Sorry!

Cheers.
GSviral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2018, 12:58 AM   #5
Gaetan
Junior Member
 
Location: Europe

Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 3
Default

Thank you again for your even quicker response!

I got those numbers too, but I guess it depends a lot on your target panel size, dups, or depth required for your analysis...

I will keep digging and if I found something, I'll post it!

Thanks again!
Gaetan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
diversity, nextseq, phix

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO