Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • seqgirl123
    Member
    • Oct 2008
    • 78

    reads and coverage question

    I am new at this and trying to wrap my head around understanding some terminology and how it all fits into the sequencing analysis side. So here are 2 questions:

    1. When someone says they desire to have a lot of reads in their Illumina sequencing, is this the same as saying they are asking for a high coverage? For example, someone says they want a lot of reads for their library, so would this be like saying they are asking for 100x coverage where coverage is the way of quantitating (100x) how many reads they desire?

    2. Are coverage and sequencing read depth the same thing?

  • #2
    Some applications need more reads than coverage. They are usually related but it can be more important to get one over the other in some cases.

    In expression and counting applications you want read #'s more than read length and coverage.

    In Chip Seq I would rather have 30 million 36bp reads rather than 15million 72bp reads. Same coverage, but one has more reads.

    Comment

    • tonybolger
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 156

      #3
      Originally posted by seqgirl123 View Post
      1. When someone says they desire to have a lot of reads in their Illumina sequencing, is this the same as saying they are asking for a high coverage? For example, someone says they want a lot of reads for their library, so would this be like saying they are asking for 100x coverage where coverage is the way of quantitating (100x) how many reads they desire?
      You can increase coverage by having more reads or longer reads, so they're not quite the same thing. When working with a reference, reads which are 'long enough to be unique' are optimal, so you're better off spending your additional bases on more reads. For denovo, 'longer' is generally more important than 'more'.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      6 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...