Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jbot
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 3

    Amount of ChIP DNA required for Solexa seqeuncing

    Hi-
    Illumina recommends using between 10-50 ng of ChIP DNA for a sample prep. Does anyone have experience with using less than 10 ng? I tried using about 2 ng (it's all that I had), figuring the worst that could happen would be to get fewer reads than usual, but I ended up getting basically no reads at all. I calculated the amount of PCR-enriched DNA to load onto the flow cell based on the A280 reading. I couldn't see the PCR-enriched sample on the Bioanalyzer, but I figured that this wasn't a big deal, as another sample that gave excellent sequencing results was only barely detectable on the Bioanalyzer.
    Does anyone know if there is a general problem with using less than 10 ng starting material?

    Thanks!
  • DSB
    Junior Member
    • May 2009
    • 6

    #2
    If you are using the Nanodrop for measuring quantity of DNA, this can be out by an order of magnitude or more. I don't lnow if this generally applies to other A280 readings at low concentrations. The recommendation is to use the Picogreen assay or a RT-PCR of properly adapted sequences for all quantitative measurements .

    Comment

    • jbot
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2009
      • 3

      #3
      I agree that the Nanodrop readings can be way off. But does anyone know whether ChIP-Seq generally works ok if one uses less than 10 ng of DNA to start off with? I quantify the concentration of ChIP DNA using a PicoGreen assay and have had no trouble when using more than 10 ng to prepare the sequencing library -- but what happens if one uses less?

      Comment

      • xenia.zhang
        Member
        • Jan 2010
        • 10

        #4
        I think it's problematic if you can't detect any PCR enriched DNA on bioanalyzer,
        however, 1ng to 10ng starting material for lib. construction worked.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        38 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        100 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        121 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
        0 responses
        114 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...