Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ETHANol
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 308

    TruSeq compatible PCR primers

    I'm doing ChIP-seq and would like to start using the TruSeq Adaptors for barcoding (single read). I have the sequences of the TruSeq adaptors from Illumina but they do not give out the sequences of the PCR primers.

    Has anyone made their own PCR primers that work with the TruSeq adaptors?

    If it's not illegal to post this trade secret, does anyone know the sequence of the Illumina PCR primers for TruSeq?
    --------------
    Ethan
  • kmcarr
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 1181

    #2
    Illumina does not want the information posted to public forums but will provided it to you simply by asking. See this thread (post #4 in particular) for further details:

    Bridged amplification & clustering followed by sequencing by synthesis. (Genome Analyzer / HiSeq / MiSeq)

    Comment

    • ETHANol
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 308

      #3
      They give out the sequences for the adaptor primers but not the PCR primers. Or at least that is the file they gave me.
      --------------
      Ethan

      Comment

      • ETHANol
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 308

        #4
        Somebody must be making their own TruSeq PCR primers (PCR Primer Cocktail as Illumina calls it).

        Anyway, after looking at the old and new adaptor sequences, I was going to give the following primers a try:

        5' aatgatacggcgaccaccga*g
        5' CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGA*G
        *=phosphothiorylate bond

        Seems like it should work. Anybody have any opinion?
        Last edited by ETHANol; 07-03-2011, 01:04 AM. Reason: edited to correct a typing error in the second primer sequence
        --------------
        Ethan

        Comment

        • bbeitzel
          Member
          • Aug 2008
          • 50

          #5
          Those look OK according to my understanding of the final library fragments. I don't think you need the phosphorothioate linkages, though.

          Comment

          • ETHANol
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2010
            • 308

            #6
            Thanks. I put the order in. We'll see if it works.

            The phosphorotiolation is suppose to increase efficiency with proofreading polymerases. Maybe it's not necessary but it couldn't hurt.


            I also Googled my primer sequences and found this:


            So it seems like it should work.
            --------------
            Ethan

            Comment

            • pmiguel
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2008
              • 2328

              #7
              Originally posted by ETHANol View Post
              Thanks. I put the order in. We'll see if it works.

              The phosphorotiolation is suppose to increase efficiency with proofreading polymerases. Maybe it's not necessary but it couldn't hurt.

              [...].
              Just to be clear:
              The phosphorothioate linkages are not susceptible to (or are less susceptible to?) exo-nucleolytic enzymes.

              The hallmark of a high fidelity enzyme is a 3'->5' exonuclease activity. So there is a connection there. But really the idea is that if your adapters have 3' overhangs that you don't want to get nibbled back by "end polishing" enzymes (eg T4 polymerase) that did not get completely removed/deactivated in an earlier step, then you put in the phosphorothioate linkages.

              --
              Phillip

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by SEQadmin2


                I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                by SEQadmin2


                Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                ...
                06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
              0 responses
              12 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
              0 responses
              48 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
              0 responses
              106 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
              0 responses
              125 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...