SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Samtools Flag to identify outward facing (mate-pair not paired end) reads lesander Bioinformatics 5 10-28-2011 01:24 PM
Use Illumina mate pair and paired ends with novoalign k2bhide Bioinformatics 1 07-23-2011 08:52 AM
Are the mate-pair reads always shadowed by their friends the paired-end (picture) seb567 Illumina/Solexa 1 07-15-2011 09:49 AM
How to check if reads are properly paired in mate-pair data? genepool_bee Bioinformatics 2 02-22-2011 01:07 AM
Difference between mate pair and pair end bassu General 2 06-19-2010 06:13 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-18-2011, 04:07 AM   #1
lre1234
Member
 
Location: US

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 58
Default paired-end vs. mate-pair

Hi all,
we are planning on doing some whole genome sequencing and I have a question. I have been under the impression that paired-end sequencing is the best method to use, but now some of the people here are telling me that we should use mate-pair.

While I know the differences between the two methods, I am not sure which is the best one to use. Does anyone have any thoughts on which one is better, or know of a pub that has compare the two methods?

Thanks for your help and thoughts.
lre1234 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2011, 06:38 AM   #2
HESmith
Senior Member
 
Location: Washington DC

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 304
Default

Mate-pair is a specific type of library; paired-end is a type of sequencing. They are not two different methods; in fact, mate-pair libraries require paired-end sequencing.

The decision to use mate-pair vs. standard libraries depends upon your application.
HESmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2011, 08:26 AM   #3
swbarnes2
Senior Member
 
Location: San Diego

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 900
Default

Mate pair allows you to have your pairs be much farther apart, which can be more informative than the standard paired-end protocol.

The downside is that it's a more complicated protocol, and it can be contaminted with ordinary paired-end reads, which I image can make analysis more difficult.
swbarnes2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2011, 05:28 PM   #4
krobison
Senior Member
 
Location: Boston area

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 747
Default

The other class of challenge from mate pair data are false mates -- cases in which the ligation step brings two unrelated molecules together. The panda genome paper is an example where this was a very serious issue.
krobison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2011, 06:56 AM   #5
cw11
Member
 
Location: Massachusetts

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 12
Default

This site describes some of the potential restrictions of the mate-pair library. I also found in this thread:

Quote:
Originally Posted by flobpf View Post
I think paired end refers to sequencing from the ENDS of a DNA fragment. If you're doing 75-bp paired end read using an insert size of 300bp, then the machine will sequence 1-75 and 300-225 (for simplicity, omitting the adapters)

Mate pair requires a completely different protocol and is typically over longer distances such as 2-5kb. If you want to sequence a 5kb mate pair library, then 5kb fragments of DNA are isolated on the gel, the ends are biotinylated, the fragment is circularized and sheared. So now when you select using streptavidin, you'll get the fragment that has the ENDS of the original 5kb fragment. This fragment is then sequenced.

Mate pair is more relevant in genome assembly, especially for covering repetitive sequences. Paired end can be used for anything - RNA, DNA.

You can get more information on the Illumina site:
http://www.illumina.com/technology/p...ing_assay.ilmn

http://www.illumina.com/technology/m...ing_assay.ilmn

I'm not sure how 454 or other methods define these terms
cw11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2011, 07:22 AM   #6
meganathan.pr
Junior Member
 
Location: Starkville

Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3
Default

Hi all,
I am trying to prepare mate pair library. I dont wanna use Illumina kit as it is costlier. Do any one have the protocol using other chemical supplies? can I get it?

Thanks
__________________
Meganathan
meganathan.pr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2011, 07:00 AM   #7
masker
Junior Member
 
Location: Taiwan

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1
Wink

I remember that because of the single read length, the 454 defined "paired-end" as "mate-pair" from Illumina.
masker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2013, 05:17 AM   #8
SEQond
Member
 
Location: Italy

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 27
Default

I find Illumina's explanation for paired-end quite lacking. Wikipedia has a better explanation
SEQond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2013, 05:25 AM   #9
chevrm
Member
 
Location: Boston, MA

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 14
Default

Mate-pairs are wonderful if you're dealing with particularly tricky assemblies, CNVs, or looking for other structural variations (translocs, etc) but may not be worth it if you don't have any of these criteria.
chevrm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.