Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ojy
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 5

    Why Illumina reads may have uneven coverage?

    Why Illumina reads may have uneven coverage of the genome? Does it depend on GC content of the genome, and if so, then why and how exactly?
    I would appreciate any explanations or references (preferably so that a non-biology background person can understand)
  • stefanoberri
    Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 35

    #2
    Hi.

    We observed that read coverage is affected by GC content. Each sample, however, have a different bias and has to be corrected independently. We don't know exaclty why, and we suspect it is somehow linked to DNA quality and extraction method.

    We briefly mention CG bias in a recent paper. Read supplementary material for a few examples. Other articles (cited) mention GC content bias.

    Comment

    • pmiguel
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2008
      • 2328

      #3
      The evidence from full genome sequencing experiments is that the majority of bias comes from enrichment PCR. If you search, you can find references to this.

      We have seen this to be the case first hand. A standard TruSeq shotgun library of Deinococcus radiodurans (a ~70% GC genome) gave us very uneven coverage. Mapped back to the reference, the reads would vary from 100x coverage down to zero. However running the same library directly, without intervening enrichment PCR, resulted in quite even coverage.

      The down-side was that cluster densities we got from the non-amplified library were much lower than expected from qPCR titration. Subsequent documentation from Illumina leads me to believe that the TruSeq adapters have some modification that interferes with them binding to the flow cell. (Possibly LNAs? I don't know if LNAs are recalcitrant to NaOH denaturation.)

      --
      Phillip

      Comment

      • KevinLam
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2009
        • 204

        #4
        out of curiousity, your illumina reads are from GAIIx? or HiSeq? AFAIK, differences in the sample prep resulted in a different GC coverage profile even within the same companies' platform.
        anecdotal evidence only, no figures or anything.
        http://kevin-gattaca.blogspot.com/

        Comment

        • TonyBrooks
          Senior Member
          • Jun 2009
          • 303

          #5
          Hi Phillip
          I think Illumina have seen this problem with non-PCR'd libraries. They seem to think the problem arises with the Y adapter not dissociating properly in the NaOH denaturation step. Their suggested solution is to perform a one cycle PCR to completely linearise the libraries before qPCR and flowcell loading.
          Also, the Kapa library amplification module is supposedly better at generating even coverage (when compared to the Phusion Taq in the Illumina kits), although we haven't tried it yet.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
            by SEQadmin2


            Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


            The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
            ...
            06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          15 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          49 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
          0 responses
          107 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
          0 responses
          125 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...