Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • osl
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 7

    Good anti-GFP/YFP for ChIP-Seq?

    Hi all,
    Just wondering if anyone could recommend a good anti-GFP/YFP for ChIP-Seq.
    I've tried quite a few (including ab290, JL-8) for ChIP-qPCR. I just found the polyclonal gives rather high background, and the monoclonal seems to have low efficiency (I'm working on Arabidopsis).
    Also, for ChIP-Seq, is monoclonal Ab a better choice over polyclonal?
    Thanks ahead.
    os
  • mudshark
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 138

    #2
    this systems works really well:


    as for 'normal' ABs, unpurified polyclonal sera usually work best in my hands, monoclonals are usually less preferred.

    Comment

    • osl
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2012
      • 7

      #3
      Thank you mudshark. I'll try this system.
      Have you been working with the GFP-Trap agarose or the magnetic ones? Looks like the agarose beads have a higher binding capacity.
      Thanks again.

      Comment

      • mudshark
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2009
        • 138

        #4
        agarose only, no idea about the magnetic ones.

        Comment

        • Buchi
          Junior Member
          • Aug 2012
          • 1

          #5
          ChIP-Seq with GFP-Trap agarose beads

          Originally posted by mudshark View Post
          this systems works really well:


          as for 'normal' ABs, unpurified polyclonal sera usually work best in my hands, monoclonals are usually less preferred.

          Hi,

          I would also try the GFP-Trap for my experiments. Do you have a good working protocol?

          Cheers

          Comment

          • epigeneticfan
            Junior Member
            • Sep 2012
            • 4

            #6
            Originally posted by osl View Post
            Hi all,
            Just wondering if anyone could recommend a good anti-GFP/YFP for ChIP-Seq.
            I've tried quite a few (including ab290, JL-8) for ChIP-qPCR. I just found the polyclonal gives rather high background, and the monoclonal seems to have low efficiency (I'm working on Arabidopsis).
            Also, for ChIP-Seq, is monoclonal Ab a better choice over polyclonal?
            Thanks ahead.
            os

            There is no general rule for using monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies, but the main differences are the following:

            The big advantage of the polyclonal is that it will recognize several epitopes on the same antigen. Which increase the change to recover enough material, especially for sequencing. But you have batch-to-batch variation. It might be that a monoclonal is “too specific”, it recognized only one epitope. And in some cases this epitope might be hidden (because of the fixation with formaldehyde leading to a different chromatin structure. All polyclonal antibodies are different so you will have to try by yourself.

            The advantage of the monoclonal is that once you have a good one and it works you don’t have to worry about batch-to-batch variations.

            Coming to the antibody: what we have in our catalogue is the following antibody:

            Validated in IF, but not yet in ChIP.
            Attached Files

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
              by SEQadmin2


              Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


              The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
              ...
              06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            7 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            42 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
            0 responses
            104 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
            0 responses
            125 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...