Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kennels
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 149

    #1

    samtools depth vs mpileup output question

    Hello

    Regarding the number of reads covering a position in a .bam alignment file, my understanding is that 'samtools depth' and 'samtools mpileup' output should represent the same thing. From what I've read up their respective explanations are :

    depth: " compute the per-base depth"
    mpileup: "the number of reads covering the site"


    However, I am getting different numbers when these options are run on the same .bam file (which is a paired end alignment file).

    For example looking at the last 5 lines of each:

    Depth:
    samtools depth aln.bam | tail -n 5
    samp2 5819 46
    samp2 5820 46
    samp2 5821 45
    samp2 5822 43
    samp2 5823 43

    mpileup (omitting the last fields):
    $ samtools mpileup -f ../samp2.fa aln.bam | tail -n 5
    [mpileup] 1 samples in 1 input files
    <mpileup> Set max per-file depth to 8000
    samp2 5819 C 24
    samp2 5820 A 24
    samp2 5821 T 24
    samp2 5822 G 23
    samp2 5823 A 23


    Probably a simple reason I am missing. Would someone be able to clarify?

    Thanks
  • Kennels
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 149

    #2
    can anyone advice? I've also contacted the samtools mail list, to no reply.
    It is probably a very simple misinterpretation on my part.

    Is the coverage from mpileup based on how many reads start at that
    position while depth is cumulative?

    Comment

    • colindaven
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2008
      • 417

      #3
      Ouch. What does it give you in VCF format ?

      Perhaps the difference is due to the number of high quality Q>13 bases, although it doesn't seem likely given the difference ? Is checking the alignment and exporting a Pileup file with read qualitiies helpful ?

      Comment

      • Kennels
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2011
        • 149

        #4
        After some piecing together of info, when I use the -A option of mpileup, then the numbers match up.
        Basically it seems 'samtools depth' uses all reads including anomalous pairs to calculate the depth, whereas 'samtools mpileup' filters out some reads including anomalous pairs. Using 'samtools mpileup -A' makes it include the anomalous pairs.

        From http://biostar.stackexchange.com/que...-all-the-reads:

        'SAMtools pileup discards unmapped reads, secondary alignments and duplicates. It uses non-unique reads.' (assuming this also applies to mpileup)

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
          by SEQadmin2



          CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

          Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
          ...
          07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
          by SEQadmin2


          Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

          The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
          ...
          07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
        0 responses
        17 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
        0 responses
        13 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...