Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pmiguel
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2328

    MiSeq vs HiSeq cluster densities

    Those of you have just gotten MiSeq and intending to use them to help dial in cluster densities for their HiSeqs, check your MyIllumina: Bulletin. Especially

    Cluster efficiency – Due to differences in the cluster generation chemistry, the MiSeq flowcells typically cluster at approximately 50% higher cluster density than the same library concentration loaded on a HiSeq flow cell (i.e. a library concentration that yields 750/mm2 clusters on a MiSeq will result in approximately 500/mm2 on a HiSeq).
    Can anyone support or contradict this? We just got the MiSeqs, so this would be mission critical for us. I guess we tend to load our HiSeq (or, previously, HiScanSQ) at 12 pM [wrong, it was loaded at 10 pM] (assay by SYBR-green KAPA qPCR with Illumina phiX as our concentration standard.) That tended to land us in the 600-800 Kclusters/mm^2 on the HiScanSQ. On the HiSeq, the phiX control lanes at 12 pM came in way low (450 K clusters/mm^2) whereas the libraries we titrated with them came in higher than expected: 700-1100K clusters/mm^2. But that could just be normal variation.

    --
    Phillip
    Last edited by pmiguel; 05-05-2012, 06:21 AM. Reason: Corrected loading concentration of phiX used.
  • Heisman
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 534

    #2
    Originally posted by pmiguel View Post
    Those of you have just gotten MiSeq and intending to use them to help dial in cluster densities for their HiSeqs, check your MyIllumina: Bulletin. Especially



    Can anyone support or contradict this? We just got the MiSeqs, so this would be mission critical for us. I guess we tend to load our HiSeq (or, previously, HiScanSQ) at 12 pM (assay by SYBR-green KAPA qPCR with Illumina phiX as our concentration standard.) That tended to land us in the 600-800 Kclusters/mm^2 on the HiScanSQ. On the HiSeq, the phiX control lanes at 12 pM came in way low (450 K clusters/mm^2) whereas the libraries we titrated with them came in higher than expected: 700-1100K clusters/mm^2. But that could just be normal variation.

    --
    Phillip
    Our sequencing core has used a 1:1.4 ratio between MiSeq:HiSeq (similar to the 1:1.5 ratio you posted above), and they are considering going even higher in their recommendations. Not being part of the core I can't really give details beyond that.

    Comment

    • megalodon
      Member
      • Sep 2010
      • 20

      #3
      Hi Philip,

      we have followed Illumina's recommendation of using a 1:1.5 ratio between MiSeq:HiSeq and by doing that, we have been achieving roughly the same cluster densities on the HiSeq as for previous MiSeq runs for the same sample.

      Daniela

      Comment

      • RPiddock
        Lab Monkey
        • Jun 2011
        • 16

        #4
        We've been loading our MiSeq at 6pM and HiSeq at 10pM and getting good results, so very similar all round.

        Rachel

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        38 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        100 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        121 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
        0 responses
        114 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...