Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TopHat alignment logs

    Dear all,

    Here is something I am confusing when I see the log file produced by TopHat:
    This is the TopHat.log:
    …….
    [2012-06-06 18:09:24] Preparing reads
    left reads: min. length=36, max. length=101, 91637851 kept reads (29218 discarded)
    [2012-06-06 19:03:03] Creating transcriptome data files..
    [2012-06-06 19:03:48] Building Bowtie index from genes.fa
    [2012-06-06 19:33:23] Mapping left_kept_reads to transcriptome genes with Bowtie2
    [2012-06-06 23:43:22] Converting left_kept_reads.m2g to genomic coordinates (map2gtf)
    [2012-06-07 00:41:00] Resuming TopHat pipeline with unmapped reads
    [2012-06-07 00:47:56] Mapping left_kept_reads.m2g_um to genome genome with Bowtie2
    [2012-06-07 05:40:29] Mapping left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg1 to genome genome with Bowtie2 (1/4)
    [2012-06-07 07:18:48] Mapping left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg2 to genome genome with Bowtie2 (2/4)
    [2012-06-07 09:29:44] Mapping left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg3 to genome genome with Bowtie2 (3/4)
    [2012-06-07 11:18:27] Mapping left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg4 to genome genome with Bowtie2 (4/4)
    ……

    And I also look at the 6 bowtie log files:
    bowtie.left_kept_reads.fixmap.log
    bowtie.left_kept_reads.m2g_um.fixmap.log
    bowtie.left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg1.fixmap.log
    bowtie.left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg2.fixmap.log
    bowtie.left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg3.fixmap.log
    bowtie.left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg4.fixmap.log

    There are the details:

    more logs/bowtie.left_kept_reads.fixmap.log
    91637851 reads; of these:
    91637851 (100.00%) were unpaired; of these:
    18520354 (20.21%) aligned 0 times
    23392329 (25.53%) aligned exactly 1 time
    49725168 (54.26%) aligned >1 times
    79.79% overall alignment rate

    more logs/bowtie.left_kept_reads.m2g_um.fixmap.log
    31718744 reads; of these:
    31718744 (100.00%) were unpaired; of these:
    4069491 (12.83%) aligned 0 times
    22890602 (72.17%) aligned exactly 1 time
    4758651 (15.00%) aligned >1 times
    87.17% overall alignment rate

    more logs/bowtie.left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg1.fixmap.log
    12545530 reads; of these:
    12545530 (100.00%) were unpaired; of these:
    10313519 (82.21%) aligned 0 times
    1421598 (11.33%) aligned exactly 1 time
    810413 (6.46%) aligned >1 times
    17.79% overall alignment rate

    more logs/bowtie.left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg2.fixmap.log
    12496456 reads; of these:
    12496456 (100.00%) were unpaired; of these:
    10103227 (80.85%) aligned 0 times
    1477840 (11.83%) aligned exactly 1 time
    915389 (7.33%) aligned >1 times
    19.15% overall alignment rate

    more logs/bowtie.left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg3.fixmap.log
    12092205 reads; of these:
    12092205 (100.00%) were unpaired; of these:
    10185446 (84.23%) aligned 0 times
    1143907 (9.46%) aligned exactly 1 time
    762852 (6.31%) aligned >1 times
    15.77% overall alignment rate

    more logs/bowtie.left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg4.fixmap.log
    9205319 reads; of these:
    9205319 (100.00%) were unpaired; of these:
    8181576 (88.88%) aligned 0 times
    581085 (6.31%) aligned exactly 1 time
    442658 (4.81%) aligned >1 times
    11.12% overall alignment rate


    Now I am confusing the relationship with these numbers: 18520354, 31718744, 12545530, 12496456, 12092205 and 9205319. I did not see that the reads aligned 0 times in left_kept_reads equal the total reads of all the m2g_um alignment reads?
    Could you tell me how tophat do the alignment in detail: such as firstly aligning the exon; then aligning the unmapping reads to junction regions? But the number of reads mapping reads to junction regions do not equal to the reads of

  • #2
    Hi,liueagle,
    I just run into the same problem, have you figure it out?
    Thanks!

    Best,
    Ellie

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • seqadmin
      Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
      by seqadmin


      Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
      04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
    • seqadmin
      Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
      by seqadmin


      Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
      03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
    0 responses
    18 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
    0 responses
    22 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
    0 responses
    17 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
    0 responses
    48 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Working...
    X