Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • liueagle
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2012
    • 2

    TopHat alignment logs

    Dear all,

    Here is something I am confusing when I see the log file produced by TopHat:
    This is the TopHat.log:
    …….
    [2012-06-06 18:09:24] Preparing reads
    left reads: min. length=36, max. length=101, 91637851 kept reads (29218 discarded)
    [2012-06-06 19:03:03] Creating transcriptome data files..
    [2012-06-06 19:03:48] Building Bowtie index from genes.fa
    [2012-06-06 19:33:23] Mapping left_kept_reads to transcriptome genes with Bowtie2
    [2012-06-06 23:43:22] Converting left_kept_reads.m2g to genomic coordinates (map2gtf)
    [2012-06-07 00:41:00] Resuming TopHat pipeline with unmapped reads
    [2012-06-07 00:47:56] Mapping left_kept_reads.m2g_um to genome genome with Bowtie2
    [2012-06-07 05:40:29] Mapping left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg1 to genome genome with Bowtie2 (1/4)
    [2012-06-07 07:18:48] Mapping left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg2 to genome genome with Bowtie2 (2/4)
    [2012-06-07 09:29:44] Mapping left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg3 to genome genome with Bowtie2 (3/4)
    [2012-06-07 11:18:27] Mapping left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg4 to genome genome with Bowtie2 (4/4)
    ……

    And I also look at the 6 bowtie log files:
    bowtie.left_kept_reads.fixmap.log
    bowtie.left_kept_reads.m2g_um.fixmap.log
    bowtie.left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg1.fixmap.log
    bowtie.left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg2.fixmap.log
    bowtie.left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg3.fixmap.log
    bowtie.left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg4.fixmap.log

    There are the details:

    more logs/bowtie.left_kept_reads.fixmap.log
    91637851 reads; of these:
    91637851 (100.00%) were unpaired; of these:
    18520354 (20.21%) aligned 0 times
    23392329 (25.53%) aligned exactly 1 time
    49725168 (54.26%) aligned >1 times
    79.79% overall alignment rate

    more logs/bowtie.left_kept_reads.m2g_um.fixmap.log
    31718744 reads; of these:
    31718744 (100.00%) were unpaired; of these:
    4069491 (12.83%) aligned 0 times
    22890602 (72.17%) aligned exactly 1 time
    4758651 (15.00%) aligned >1 times
    87.17% overall alignment rate

    more logs/bowtie.left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg1.fixmap.log
    12545530 reads; of these:
    12545530 (100.00%) were unpaired; of these:
    10313519 (82.21%) aligned 0 times
    1421598 (11.33%) aligned exactly 1 time
    810413 (6.46%) aligned >1 times
    17.79% overall alignment rate

    more logs/bowtie.left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg2.fixmap.log
    12496456 reads; of these:
    12496456 (100.00%) were unpaired; of these:
    10103227 (80.85%) aligned 0 times
    1477840 (11.83%) aligned exactly 1 time
    915389 (7.33%) aligned >1 times
    19.15% overall alignment rate

    more logs/bowtie.left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg3.fixmap.log
    12092205 reads; of these:
    12092205 (100.00%) were unpaired; of these:
    10185446 (84.23%) aligned 0 times
    1143907 (9.46%) aligned exactly 1 time
    762852 (6.31%) aligned >1 times
    15.77% overall alignment rate

    more logs/bowtie.left_kept_reads.m2g_um_seg4.fixmap.log
    9205319 reads; of these:
    9205319 (100.00%) were unpaired; of these:
    8181576 (88.88%) aligned 0 times
    581085 (6.31%) aligned exactly 1 time
    442658 (4.81%) aligned >1 times
    11.12% overall alignment rate


    Now I am confusing the relationship with these numbers: 18520354, 31718744, 12545530, 12496456, 12092205 and 9205319. I did not see that the reads aligned 0 times in left_kept_reads equal the total reads of all the m2g_um alignment reads?
    Could you tell me how tophat do the alignment in detail: such as firstly aligning the exon; then aligning the unmapping reads to junction regions? But the number of reads mapping reads to junction regions do not equal to the reads of
  • ellieduan
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2015
    • 2

    #2
    Hi,liueagle,
    I just run into the same problem, have you figure it out?
    Thanks!

    Best,
    Ellie

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
      by SEQadmin2



      Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
      ...
      07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
      by SEQadmin2



      Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

      There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
      07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
    0 responses
    24 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
    0 responses
    33 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
    0 responses
    21 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
    0 responses
    34 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...