![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Annovar | rechu | Bioinformatics | 4 | 05-30-2012 01:40 AM |
annovar output - question | dkrtndhkd | Bioinformatics | 3 | 04-29-2012 10:23 AM |
Questions about ANNOVAR | xujie | Bioinformatics | 2 | 02-23-2012 10:27 PM |
annovar question | kenietz | Bioinformatics | 5 | 02-06-2012 01:20 AM |
What is the meaning of quality value? | lowfat | SOLiD | 4 | 10-26-2009 01:20 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: Seoul Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 42
|
![]()
Hi,
I want to know the meaning of 'REJECT' of output file of ANNOVAR like follow: line2 nonsynonymous SNV MLH1:NM_001167619:exon11:c.T428A ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thank you! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: St. Louis Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 535
|
![]()
ANNOVAR keeps all of the input columns and puts them at the end of the annotation columns. "REJECT' was in the input file.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: California Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 97
|
![]()
It appears you have used MuTect to call your SNVs. The current beta version of MuTect is very verbose and the initial output is more than a hundred fold bigger than it should be.
use "grep -v REJECT variant_file > variant_file_KEEP" to get the real variants and then annotate. You may also want to remove "UNCOVERED" variants and "DBSNP" variants.. The example variant you have given is a total failure.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Location: Seoul Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 42
|
![]()
Thank you!!!!
I see it now because the alarm mail was in spam box... ![]() another question! is there any option of MuTect to get output with VCF format??? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Location: California Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 97
|
![]()
No, not currently, as far as I know.. May I ask why you specifically want it in vcf format?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Location: Seoul Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 42
|
![]()
because in my pipeline, i use ANNOVAR tool for annotation step and ANNOVAR gets input file with VCF format
![]() I know I can change some column to make input file(vcf4.0 format) for ANNOVAR, but I also want to bring other info as i wrote above. however, after changing the form of MuTect result file to vcf4.0 file, the ANNOVAR result file is not uniform according to each line of MuTect result file, so it's hard to see it. it's the reason ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Location: St. Louis Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 535
|
![]()
The annovar input file only needs 5 columns; you can check the website to see the proper format (it's chr/base/base/ref/var for SNPs, check for indels and make sure it makes sense to you). Once you figure that out it should be easy to take your variant files and add 5 initial columns with the correct information; the rest will carry through so you won't lose anything.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Location: NikoNarita.jp Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 142
|
![]()
I tried using MuTect output .bam.out to convert into avinput, however, the format was not proper and I got no annotations after annovar. Moreover, when I used sed '/REJCT/d' input.bam.out > output_file ; it worked and there was no problem. But I want to include 'REJCT' also and filter it out later after annovar is done. Is there something wrong with my commands. The same commands worked after removing 'REJCT' but not working with 'REJECT'.
My commands are: $ perl ./annovar/convert2annovar.pl -format vcf4 call_status.bam.out > call_status.bam.avinput $ perl ./annovar/annotate_variation.pl --geneanno call_status.bam.avinput ./annovar/humandb --buildver hg19 $ perl ./annovar/summarize_annovar.pl call_status.bam.avinput ./annovar/humandb/ --buildver hg19 --verdbsnp 137 --ver1000g 1000g2012apr --veresp 6500 --genetype refgene --outfile annovar_snp_annotated.txt --remove Can somebody tell something ? thank you in advance. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|