Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RickBioinf
    Member
    • Sep 2012
    • 28

    Removing Chimeric sequences from Metagenomics samples

    I'm making 2 Metagenomics pipelines (one for WGS and one for 16S) and I just found out about Chimeras and I think I understand what they are.

    Chimeric sequences are products when 2 halves of a PCR product "link" together to form one sequence. This is a problem because the sequence can then be assigned as a different (wrong) sequence.

    But I don't (at all) see this as a problem for 16S, because this sequence is so short you'll allow a very small mismatch ratio (0-1) so you won't see anything.
    The people I work with have never looked for Chimeric sequences and say that it isn't really a problem here even for WGS. Are they wrong? Why do I want to really search for chimeric sequences? What kind of tool do you advise to use? And am I wrong about the 16S approach?

    Thanks for reading and if you reply, thank you even more.
  • cliffbeall
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 144

    #2
    The chimera frequency in WGS will be very low and shouldn't be a problem. The frequency in 16S experiments is much higher because there are short conserved sequences that can internally prime during the PCR.

    They are a problem in 16S because they chimeras can get treated as novel OTUs and inflate diversity estimates. I'm not sure what your point about mismatch ratio is.

    Comment

    • RickBioinf
      Member
      • Sep 2012
      • 28

      #3
      Hi cliffbeal,

      Thank you for replying.
      I see that I haven't been complete. I'm talking about the V4 region in the 16S.
      With mismatch ratio (maybe I'm using the wrong term here) I mean that when you align your sequence you allow a certain amount of mismatches to the sequence, because of possible errors in your PCR.
      But the problem with this is that if you have just a small amount of "mismatches" or mutations in your sequence it could be considered as the wrong organism.
      So in that order you would allow a small amount of errors with the alignment and chimeras shouldn't be a problem then.

      Regards,

      Rick

      Comment

      • cliffbeall
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2010
        • 144

        #4
        You often see chimeras between parent sequences with <90% identity. That can generate things that are not 97% identical to either parent if you're using that threshold so they get classified as a novel OTU.

        This reference is pretty good on the formation of chimeras, though I think most people use uchime rather than chimera slayer these days.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        9 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 08:59 AM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...