Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • moldoverb
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 4

    Building a compute server for RNA-seq

    Hi all,

    I'm going to be processing a number of Illumina paired-end RNA-seq samples, and looking to build a new server to handle the load. Production work can be done on a cluster once we get going (over 2k samples planned) but for now I want something I can use for 6-20 samples over the next couple months.

    I was thinking of something with 8 cores, 32gb memory, but more cores would be better. Any suggestions on what would be an ideal configuration, even down to specifying hardware, would be appreciated
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Here is a thread about this from not so long ago. 6-20 samples over a couple of months can be done on a very simple *nix machine.

    Discussion of next-gen sequencing related bioinformatics: resources, algorithms, open source efforts, etc


    If you are planning to move to a cluster eventually why not just start there?
    Last edited by GenoMax; 12-18-2012, 09:38 AM.

    Comment

    • moldoverb
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2009
      • 4

      #3
      Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
      Here is a thread about this from not so long ago. 6-20 samples over a couple of months can be done on a very simple *nix machine.

      http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24772
      Thanks. A lot of that thread is geared toward buying Apple. I plan on building a server. Also the CPU's they recommend are $1500 each. No discussion of AMD as an alternative.

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Originally posted by moldoverb View Post
        Thanks. A lot of that thread is geared toward buying Apple. I plan on building a server. Also the CPU's they recommend are $1500 each. No discussion of AMD as an alternative.
        Posts #6 and #4 have the general info you are looking for in that thread. Since linux will run equally well on intel or AMD chips the exact CPU purchase would be your choice.

        Comment

        • moldoverb
          Junior Member
          • Apr 2009
          • 4

          #5
          Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
          Posts #6 and #4 have the general info you are looking for in that thread. Since linux will run equally well on intel or AMD chips the exact CPU purchase would be your choice.
          Looking at the AMD 6273 processor - 16 cores and I could put two on one motherboard. Only issue is that it is limited to 8 FPU's and I don't know if tophat/cufflinks etc. does a lot of floating-point calculations or mostly integer.

          Comment

          • turnersd
            Senior Member
            • May 2011
            • 115

            #6
            I might interject opting for 48GB RAM instead of 32. I bet you'll see newer aligners (e.g. STAR) come out over the next few years that trade a modest memory requirement increase for a big gain in mapping speed. STAR requires about 30GB RAM. 32 might be insufficient after any OS and other requirements.

            Comment

            • moldoverb
              Junior Member
              • Apr 2009
              • 4

              #7
              This is getting fun. It looks like I could build a decent machine for around $2200. I have a 4Tb RAID array which I can dedicate to this machine, and a couple 1Tb drives, so that saves money. To turnersd point, I can always add more memory later.

              2x AMD Opteron 6272 CPU (16 core each)
              32gb Quad memory
              256gb SSD

              cooling/case/DVD

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by SEQadmin2


                I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                by SEQadmin2


                Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                ...
                06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
              0 responses
              8 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
              0 responses
              44 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
              0 responses
              104 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
              0 responses
              125 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...