Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • chadn737
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 392

    Tophat --max-intron-length

    Does anyone have any recommendations on setting the --max-intron-length on tophat?

    Few people seem to adjust this or at least report it, given the literature, and in the past I have never messed with it. However I have noticed that I often get reads, spanning dozens of genes, with massive "introns" of hundreds of thousands. My first thought is that these may be chimeric reads, but a lot of them have secondary alignments that seem correct, albeit with lower mapping quality due to mismatches.
  • john_nl
    Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 13

    #2
    Maybe it would be a good idea to analyze the distribution of intron lengths in the genome you study. Then pick the 95th percentile or something like that as the maximum intron size to avoid 'odd' behavior.

    Comment

    • cascoamarillo
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2010
      • 164

      #3
      Thats a really good idea. I haven't too much experience with tophat and RNA-seq and also finding these massive introns I wondered why? Maybe the default parameter in --max-intron-length (500000) is a little bit high, and not quite realistic (?).

      Comment

      • abisko00
        Member
        • Jul 2015
        • 14

        #4
        Hi!

        I would like to revive this thread, as I am very much interested in an answer. Most alignment programs require this parameter and they all use different default settings. I would assume that for each genome a reasonable setting should exist. I appreciate the advice to determine it myself, but I am for sure not the only one aligning reads to e.g. the human genome. So is there any source of reasonable values for frequently used genomes?

        Cheers,
        Markus

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        49 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        107 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        125 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...