Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • quinlana
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 119

    BEDTools Version 2.2

    Hi all,
    I am releasing a new version of BEDTools that addresses many of the requests that I've received over the last month. It took me a bit to find time to incorporate the changes. I hope the new functionality proves useful to those that use the BEDTools suite.

    The source is posted here: http://people.virginia.edu/~arq5x/bedtools.html
    as well as on SourceForge.

    All the best,
    Aaron

    === Notable changes in this release ===

    1. coverageBed will (optionally) only count features in BED file A (e.g. sequencing reads) that overlap with the intervals/windows in BED file B on the same strand. This has been requested several times recently and facilitates CHiP-Seq and RNA-Seq experiments.

    2. intersectBed can now require a minimum __reciprocal__ overlap between intervals in BED A and BED B. For example, previously, if one used -f 0.90, it required that a feature in B overlap 90% of the feature in A for the "hit" to be reported. If one adds the -r (reciprocal) option, the hit must also cover 90% of the feature in B. This helps to exclude overlaps between say small features in A and large features in B:

    A ==========
    B *********************************************

    -f 0.50 (Reported), whereas -f 0.50 -r (Not reported)

    3. The score field has been changed to be a string. While this deviates from the UCSC definition, it allows one to track much more meaningful information about a feature/interval. For example, score could now be:

    7.31E-05 (a p-value)
    0.334577 (mean enrichment)
    2:2.2:40:2 (several values encoded in a string)

    4. closestBed now, by default, reports __all__ intervals in B that overlap equally with an interval in A. Previously, it merely reported the first such feature that appeared in B. Using the -t option, one can also choose to report either the first or the last entry in B in the event of a tie.

    5. Several other minor changes to the algorithms have been made to increase speed a bit.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    Yesterday, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:08 AM
0 responses
6 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
11 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
18 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
52 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...