Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • piemmea
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 6

    DESeq with time points & different samples

    Hi all,
    I'm a PhD student newbie to statistical analysis in RNAseq. I got an experimental design and I'm trying to find a good way to approach the analysis of the results.
    Basically, I have 5 different fruit varieties harvested at 4 different time points that have been RNAsequenced (so far with no replicas, don't know if we'll get a second shot). I was asked to find those genes showing a different behavior in the 5 varieties both in terms of differential expression on the respective time points and in terms of time course. I thought to use DESeq with the "blind" method (according to the vignette) by making a pair-wise comparison of one of such varieties (and in one time point) with the others (and the other time points, within the same, repeated for the 5).

    The problem is, that I am not sure whether this is the most straight-forward way to approach this problem and, moreover, it is still not so clear to me how to represent the results (if making a mega-merge or so).

    Does anyone have/can give me a hint?
    many thanks
    Marco
  • dietmar13
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 107

    #2
    not so easy...

    I don't want to offend you - not al all - but perhaps your supervisors...

    why do people plan their experiments not carefully? nobody would make a western blot without knowing how to analyse and interpret the results, but thousonds of bucks get invested in NGS and there is no plan who will and how to analyse.

    For you design I see no satisfactory solution. without knowing at least a littlebit about biological variance of each sample and timepoint there is no chance to get robust differentially expressed genes.

    If I would have 20 samples free, I would have analysed e.g. either the 5 fruits with 4 biological replicates or 2 fruits at 3 timepoints with three replicates.

    One chance will be a gene (set) enrichment analysis (G(S)EA) which works different (it accumulates statistical information over genes, not over samples)) and does not need necessarily biological replicates.

    I don't know if a time-series version of G(S)EA is available, at least a version for multigroup analysis is available, implemented in the R-package limma (mroast-function). you can import your count-table (htseq-count) with voom() create a contrast matrix and analyse with mroast.
    Last edited by dietmar13; 03-17-2013, 11:06 PM. Reason: typo...

    Comment

    • piemmea
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2013
      • 6

      #3
      Thank you Dietmar, I'll try with that.
      Regarding the general thing, we are interested in spotting at differences in ripening, and thus at genes that are differentially expressed with each other during the process.
      I thought I could first look at the time development and then, after having identified (grouped) those genes showing the same expression behavior, perform a kind of pair-wise comparison with one variety that I think I can
      surely take as reference.
      Maybe this is not optimal, but is the best thing I can think about at the moment. Do you think is reasonable?
      Thanks

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by SEQadmin2



        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
        ...
        Yesterday, 11:10 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:04 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      9 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      17 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      31 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...