Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • elfuser
    Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 16

    Varying lengths in 2x150 Miseq sequencing data

    I have data from a 2x150 Miseq run but I have noticed that the read lengths vary quite a lot. They range from 35 to 151 bp. I am interested in assembling these data with BWA or BOWTIE2 and I would like to know whether this is would be a problem and if not why?
    Thanks
  • gwilkie
    Member
    • Dec 2011
    • 27

    #2
    Hi Elfuser,

    The different read lengths could be caused by adapter clipping? - the MiSeq has a small check box for this on the sample set up screen that is often defaulted to on. This clips off the adapter sequences from your reads. Any library fragment that is shorter than your read length will run into the adapters (a bit like sequencing into the vector in the old days!). Its a good idea to remove the adapter sequences, but it does lead to variable read lengths. Instead of letting the MiSeq do this, I usually remove adapter and quality trim my data with trim_galore, which you can set with a minimum acceptable read length.

    bwa doesn't seem to mind datasets with different length reads. As far as I understand (I'm not a bioinformatician!) bwa works by looking for a short exact match between the read and the reference sequence (called the seed, default 20bp). When it finds a match, it then extends this. So as long as your reads are longer than the seed length it will work.

    I don't know about bowtie2 I'm afraid.

    Best wishes,
    Gavin

    Comment

    • shaik sabiha
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2012
      • 4

      #3
      Hi,

      I am also facing a similar situation right now. I have Miseq data with varying read lengths. Is is fine to go ahead with the denovo assembly into contigs ? will these reads with different lengths affect the assembly and the downstream analysis?

      Comment

      • gwilkie
        Member
        • Dec 2011
        • 27

        #4
        Yes, go ahead. Most de novo assemblers these days can handle variable read lengths.

        Depending on the assembler you choose, you probably want to trim your raw data for quality and remove any very short reads before you start the assembly. Remember its important to maintain the same order in your forward and reverse reads if you have paired ends.

        Any reads that are shorter than your hash (k-mer) length ought to be removed or ignored by the assembly software.

        Comment

        • shaik sabiha
          Junior Member
          • Jan 2012
          • 4

          #5
          Hi Gwilkie,
          Thank you for your advice. I have trimmed the reads and then assembled them using velvet. Assembly looks good.

          Comment

          • shaik sabiha
            Junior Member
            • Jan 2012
            • 4

            #6
            Hi,
            Can you suggest which assembler shoud be prefered for longer read lengths i.e above 200bp.

            Comment

            • gwilkie
              Member
              • Dec 2011
              • 27

              #7
              It depends on what genome you are trying to assemble - e.g. virus, bacteria, vertebrate. I suggest you start a new thread as this is a complex subject and there are now many different assemblers to choose from... each with their strengths and weaknesses.

              ABySS is a good general assembler that is easy to use and does not require a huge amount of computer resources. However, all De Bruijn graph assemblers have a maximum hash length (k-mer size) that generally cannot exceed 128 due to computing power limitations.

              Therefore very long reads do not necessarily help the initial assembly but can be useful later for closing gaps, joining contigs or resolving repeats.

              Hope that helps


              Originally posted by shaik sabiha View Post
              Hi,
              Can you suggest which assembler shoud be prefered for longer read lengths i.e above 200bp.

              Comment

              • shaik sabiha
                Junior Member
                • Jan 2012
                • 4

                #8
                Hi Gwilkie,

                I think its a good idea to start a new thread. So far I was using velvet for 150bp reads and now I am experiment with IDBA for 250 bp ones. Will be checking out ABySS as well. Thank you

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                  ...
                  07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                  There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                  07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
                0 responses
                23 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
                0 responses
                15 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
                0 responses
                33 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
                0 responses
                31 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...