Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ynwh
    Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 16

    Tools to perform QC of methylation calling

    Hi,

    My BS-seq mapping generated different methylation level value (count_C/(count_C+count_T)) at different bases. Some values are very low (~0.07). I wonder if there is a widely accepted threshold to filter unreliable methylation calling or any tool can do this?

    Many thanks
  • PeteH
    Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 64

    #2
    To clarify, are you wanting to identify cytosines that show evidence of methylation and thus you want to filter out any with low estimated levels of methylation that you think might be simply attributable to 'error' (be that sequencing error, bisuflite-conversion error, mapping error, base calling error, etc.)?

    If so, you might have a read of the supplementary material of Lister et al. (Nature, 2009 and 2011: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19829295, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21289626). They use a binomial test to "[establish] the minimum threshold number of cytosines sequenced at each reference cytosine position at which the position could be called as methylated, so that out of all methylcytosines identified no more than 1% would be due to the error rate."

    I don't know of any software off-hand that implements this test for BS-seq data but it is a simple binomial test that could be implemented in, for example, R.

    I would be reluctant to use a simple threshold (e.g. 0.3) because the estimated methylation level is a function of the coverage in BS-seq, as is the standard error of your estimate. And I don't think there is a "widely accepted" threshold. That said, this paper (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23598999) does provide thresholds, although the paper they cite is a study using microarrays (where thresholds may be more justified) rather than BS-seq.

    Hope this helps,
    Pete

    Comment

    • ynwh
      Member
      • Jul 2011
      • 16

      #3
      Pete,

      Many thanks for your answer. That's really helpful.

      Comment

      • chadn737
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2009
        • 392

        #4
        You really need a control for you BS treatment, an unmethylated genome which was also treated with BS so that you can estimate the conversion. In plants the chloroplast genome serves as a convenient internal control, otherwise you should spike in lambda phage in your samples. That is essential to the calculations used by Lister et al.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        34 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        99 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        120 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
        0 responses
        113 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...