Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • eeyun
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2013
    • 9

    Alignment to a set of custom reference sequences along with standard genome reference

    Hi there - any help appreciated here, I'm a relative newbie to NGS evaluation.

    I'd like to be able to detect low level deletions of 15bp (or more) in an amplicon-enrichment based assay. We are using Novoalign for alignment, followed by samtools and varscan for variant ID. This all works find up to ~6bp.

    I have tried pindel etc. with limited success. As the deletions we are looking for are relatively recurrent, I was thinking of trying a synthetic reference approach. I'm unclear how I can integrate this alignment strategy with our alternative standard reference alignment.

    I'd prefer to create a single fasta file as a reference, but for all of the short synthetic deletion sequences I append (one per record), I'd like to preserve their original chromosomal position etc.

    Am I dreaming?

    Any help or other recommendations much appreciated!
  • swbarnes2
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 910

    #2
    You can of course make a reference file that has multiple sequences in it, so you can append previously discovered deletions into your fasta, and then if your reads align to those sequences, you will see them.

    But making their coordinates match is not feasible, and I don't see why it's necessary.

    Comment

    • eeyun
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2013
      • 9

      #3
      Originally posted by swbarnes2 View Post
      You can of course make a reference file that has multiple sequences in it, so you can append previously discovered deletions into your fasta, and then if your reads align to those sequences, you will see them.

      But making their coordinates match is not feasible, and I don't see why it's necessary.
      Thanks for your input. I am hoping to preserve the coordinates to enable visualization and annotation without too much deviation from our standard practice.

      Comment

      • KaiYe
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2009
        • 133

        #4
        Originally posted by eeyun View Post
        Hi there - any help appreciated here, I'm a relative newbie to NGS evaluation.

        I'd like to be able to detect low level deletions of 15bp (or more) in an amplicon-enrichment based assay. We are using Novoalign for alignment, followed by samtools and varscan for variant ID. This all works find up to ~6bp.

        I have tried pindel etc. with limited success. As the deletions we are looking for are relatively recurrent, I was thinking of trying a synthetic reference approach. I'm unclear how I can integrate this alignment strategy with our alternative standard reference alignment.

        I'd prefer to create a single fasta file as a reference, but for all of the short synthetic deletion sequences I append (one per record), I'd like to preserve their original chromosomal position etc.

        Am I dreaming?

        Any help or other recommendations much appreciated!

        Pindel should find large deletions. can you pass your data to me to take a look?

        Kai

        Comment

        • shi
          Wei Shi
          • Feb 2010
          • 236

          #5
          Originally posted by eeyun View Post
          Hi there - any help appreciated here, I'm a relative newbie to NGS evaluation.

          I'd like to be able to detect low level deletions of 15bp (or more) in an amplicon-enrichment based assay. We are using Novoalign for alignment, followed by samtools and varscan for variant ID. This all works find up to ~6bp.

          I have tried pindel etc. with limited success. As the deletions we are looking for are relatively recurrent, I was thinking of trying a synthetic reference approach. I'm unclear how I can integrate this alignment strategy with our alternative standard reference alignment.

          I'd prefer to create a single fasta file as a reference, but for all of the short synthetic deletion sequences I append (one per record), I'd like to preserve their original chromosomal position etc.

          Am I dreaming?

          Any help or other recommendations much appreciated!
          Hi @eeyun,

          You may try the Subread aligner (http://subread.sourceforge.net) which can detect up to 16 bp indels.

          Cheers
          Wei

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            Yesterday, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
            by SEQadmin2


            Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


            The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
            ...
            06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          11 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          52 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
          0 responses
          111 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...