SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > General



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to search by instrument in SRA? Jasmine Bioinformatics 3 07-08-2010 03:15 PM
Next gen sequencing: urgent and updated instrument comparison censinis RNA Sequencing 0 10-14-2009 01:25 AM
New user profile field, which instrument(s) do you have? ECO Site Announcements 0 06-22-2008 08:50 PM
Heliscope instrument pricing announced ECO Helicos / Direct Genomics 0 11-01-2007 07:01 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-15-2009, 05:43 AM   #1
brjordan
Member
 
Location: Marseille France

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 23
Question Instrument statistics, anyone?

The number of machines sold by each major manufacturer is a closely guarded secret - they gave some figures at the beginning, but no longer now (as far as I've been able to see). Does anyone have firm or semi-firm estimates? My own guestimate is around 1,000 systems sold altogether, more than half being Illumina and the rest shared (about equally) between 454 and SOLiD...
Do you agree, disagree?

All replies will be VERY welcome!
__________________
Bertrand Jordan
Marseille-Nice Genopole
Luminy Science Park
13288 Marseille, FRANCE
brjordan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2009, 06:41 AM   #2
cgb
Member
 
Location: Cambridge

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 50
Default

whilst I also don't have access to any official numbers either, your estimate sounds about right -- based on what ive heard.
cgb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 02:41 AM   #3
steven
Senior Member
 
Location: Southern France

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brjordan View Post
The number of machines sold by each major manufacturer is a closely guarded secret - they gave some figures at the beginning, but no longer now (as far as I've been able to see). Does anyone have firm or semi-firm estimates? My own guestimate is around 1,000 systems sold altogether, more than half being Illumina and the rest shared (about equally) between 454 and SOLiD...
Do you agree, disagree?

All replies will be VERY welcome!
Hey, you forgot the 11 Heliscope from Helicos!

Well, your estimation sounds quite realistic to me, a market study i read was displaying similar numbers.
Regarding the distribution -by location and manufacturers- a sample is available on this map.
cheers,
s.
steven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 03:03 AM   #4
brjordan
Member
 
Location: Marseille France

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 23
Thumbs up Other makes

Yes, I did forget Helicos (and also the Polonator), but these are still very small contributors... Can you tell a little more about the market study you saw (I suppose it is one of these $3,000 studies and is not available)?

Anyway, thanks for your reply, and I'm happy to see that my ballpark estimate seem to be reasonable.

Cheers,

Bertrand
__________________
Bertrand Jordan
Marseille-Nice Genopole
Luminy Science Park
13288 Marseille, FRANCE
brjordan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 05:33 AM   #5
steven
Senior Member
 
Location: Southern France

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 269
Default

Hi Bertrand,
No, i did not pay 3000$.. i think i saw this in genomeweb article.
You may also be interested in the only two surveys i am aware of with publicly available results:
http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1108
http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2273
cheers,
s.
steven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 05:12 PM   #6
krobison
Senior Member
 
Location: Boston area

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 747
Default

Illumina reported today at users meeting they recently shipped 1500th instrument.
krobison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2009, 12:24 AM   #7
brjordan
Member
 
Location: Marseille France

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 23
Default

This sounds very high (1,500 GA instruments shipped)... Are you sure they are referring exclusively to GA and not lumping together other instruments? Do you have any link to this statement?
Thanks,

Bertrand
__________________
Bertrand Jordan
Marseille-Nice Genopole
Luminy Science Park
13288 Marseille, FRANCE
brjordan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2009, 04:53 AM   #8
kmcarr
Senior Member
 
Location: USA, Midwest

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,145
Default

If their serial numbers are meaningful then they have shipped over 1500. We just got an instrument a month ago and its serial number is 1599. Our original instrument, received about 2.5 years ago was serial number 216.
kmcarr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2009, 01:49 AM   #9
brjordan
Member
 
Location: Marseille France

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 23
Default

Well, serial numbers are not always meaningful - remember the story of Hitler's party card number? (number 555 - but they had started the numbering at 500 so as not to give away their small numbers).
However if you saw #216 two years ago and now see #1599 - this looks pretty solid (not SOLiD!)...
Any other comments to confirm this? Recent serial numbers or other info?

Thanks to all,

Bertrand
__________________
Bertrand Jordan
Marseille-Nice Genopole
Luminy Science Park
13288 Marseille, FRANCE
brjordan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2009, 01:15 PM   #10
GW_OK
Senior Member
 
Location: Oklahoma

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 401
Default

Our serial number is 1508. We got ours delivered in late September.
GW_OK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 03:26 AM   #11
dan
wiki wiki
 
Location: Cambridge, England

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 265
Default

On this subject... Anyone got good figures for 'cost per Mega base' for the Illumina, 454 and Sanger technologies?

I have the following numbers:

Sanger 5.00 pounds per megabase.
Roche 0.02 pounds per megabase.
Illumina 0.002 pounds per megabase.


However, they seem too low!

Can anyone interpret these values for me?

Can anyone offer other values with appropriate interpretation?

Cheers,
__________________
Homepage: Dan Bolser
MetaBase the database of biological databases.
dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 02:56 AM   #12
Jonathan
Member
 
Location: Germany

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 36
Default

Nah, maybe a little high!

I did some calculations for a small talk last year and based by numbers on the official pricing of the 'Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy' at Duke University, Durham, USA - last January or so:

Saenger: 150$ --> 96kbp in ~1000bp
Illumina: 1950$ --> 325Mbp in 2x36bp
454: 8000$ --> 30Mbp in ~260bp

Saenger: 0.0015 $ ~7bp/cent
454: 0.0004 $ ~ 25bp/cent
Illumina: 0.000006 $ ~ 1600bp/cent

unless I was having some serious miscalculations...or very off estimates...

While Illumina is cheapest, you need a moderate to serious coverage for deNovo sequencing and so on...

Best
-Jonathan
Jonathan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2009, 03:04 AM   #13
dan
wiki wiki
 
Location: Cambridge, England

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 265
Default

Thanks Jonathan!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathan View Post
While Illumina is cheapest, you need a moderate to serious coverage for deNovo sequencing and so on...

Right, that is kind of what I meant by 'interpretation'. i.e. the difference between the cost of a 'finished base' vs. the cost of a 'raw base'.

I'll see how these numbers come out when I multiply through by my volume of data...

Dan.
__________________
Homepage: Dan Bolser
MetaBase the database of biological databases.
dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 06:33 AM   #14
brjordan
Member
 
Location: Marseille France

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 23
Default

Thank you all for your helpful feedback.

So we are left with an estimate of 1,000 machines (total, ca. 50% Illumina, the rest shared between SOLiD & 454), which several people agreed with (this is also in line with a June '09 report by the Leerink Swann investment bank), and another much higher estimate according to which there would be more than 1,500 Illumina machines, and presumably around 1,000 others... The error bar is pretty large! My impression (for what it's worth) is that the CURRENT (dec. '09) figure is probably at or above 2,000 total since a) the Leerink report did not account for all genome centers (and much less all individual labs), b) there has apparently been a buying spree lately, and c) the evidence for 1,500 Illumina machines is anecdotal (serial numbers) but significant.

One more point: it looks as if 454 has been losing market share. Maybe that's why they just announced a "454 junior" with 1/5th the price and 1/10th the throughput of their current system?

All comments are of course welcome...

Bertrand
__________________
Bertrand Jordan
Marseille-Nice Genopole
Luminy Science Park
13288 Marseille, FRANCE
brjordan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 08:51 AM   #15
cgb
Member
 
Location: Cambridge

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 50
Default discounts

of course what we can never expect to see is how many machines are fully paid for, how many are discounted and how many are just placed for free.
cgb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 07:37 AM   #16
GW_OK
Senior Member
 
Location: Oklahoma

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 401
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brjordan View Post
Thank you all for your helpful feedback.

One more point: it looks as if 454 has been losing market share. Maybe that's why they just announced a "454 junior" with 1/5th the price and 1/10th the throughput of their current system?
I heard about the GS Jr. several years ago from a Roche rep (very hush-hush at the time) so I don't think rolling it out is in response to market share. Frankly I thought the project had been shelved until they announced it.
GW_OK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2009, 02:29 AM   #17
james hadfield
Moderator
Cambridge, UK
Community Forum
 
Location: Cambridge, UK

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 221
Default

Our GAs have serial numbers and apprximate installation dates of:
202 October 2007
350 May 2008
582 December 2008
james hadfield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2009, 02:40 AM   #18
dan
wiki wiki
 
Location: Cambridge, England

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 265
Default

Have you heard of the 'Tank counting statistic'?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006...war.tvandradio


Assuming sequential serial numbers, you should be able to bound the number of machines 'in the wild'.
__________________
Homepage: Dan Bolser
MetaBase the database of biological databases.
dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 06:56 AM   #19
nickloman
Senior Member
 
Location: Birmingham, UK

Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 356
Default

Hi guys

As part of the high-throughput sequencing map site James Hadfield and I set up, I've added a little page to collect instrument serial numbers.

Once we've got enough numbers for any given platform I'll post the results on the page. Hopefully we can get enough serials for each platform to get definitive data on the numbers of shipped instruments.

This is entirely anonymous and I won't publish the serial numbers so you won't upset your instrument rep!

Go visit http://pathogenomics.bham.ac.uk/hts/serial to take part

Cheers!

Nick.
nickloman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 11:25 AM   #20
steven
Senior Member
 
Location: Southern France

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dan View Post
Have you heard of the 'Tank counting statistic'?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006...war.tvandradio


Assuming sequential serial numbers, you should be able to bound the number of machines 'in the wild'.
Right. We are assuming here that for instance, none of the companies uses the same series for several kinds of products.
Tank counting is ok as long as only tanks are numbered..
steven is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO