Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Seq1234
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2008
    • 5

    BWA 0.5 and 0.5.5 are in-compatible

    The alignments generated using 0.5.0 (.sai file)
    gets corrupted when processed further using 0.5.5 version
    for generating the .sam file.

    for example for the sai file generated using the 0.5 version here is the output sam file

    BTLM07P_FC42PBM_7_15_2_9 4 * 0 0 * * ...
    BTLM07P_FC42PBM_7_15_2_A 16 Chr8 368744 0 100M ...

    This is the correct result ...

    where as when I used the 0.5.5 version to generate the sam file the output is as follows:

    BTLM07P_FC42PBM_7_15_2_9 16 Chr8 368744 0 100M
    BTLM07P_FC42PBM_7_15_2_A 4 * 0 0 * *

    Notice the shifts in the alignments reported.

    I expect all major users will re-use the .sai file for most of their analyses. Hence this can be big problem.
  • lh3
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 686

    #2
    No, sai is a fast changing format and does not guarantee backward compatibility at all. One should not keep sai files. I always delete them when I get SAM output.

    Comment

    • maubp
      Peter (Biopython etc)
      • Jul 2009
      • 1544

      #3
      How about adding a version field to the SAI format to prevent this kind of mismatch (causing subtle corruption of data)? A clear error message would be much nicer.

      Comment

      • lh3
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 686

        #4
        Thanks. This is a good suggestion.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          Yesterday, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        6 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        18 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        52 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...