Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Simonli
    Member
    • Oct 2013
    • 14

    #1

    When running Bowtie in Chrysalis, unable to decipher reads

    Hi Guys,
    I`m a RNAseq beginner, I`m using ConDeTri to trim and filter the reads, and inchworm is running good, generate a both.fa file, however when I running the step two of Trinity, it shows my reads could not be deciphered as being /1 or /2 of a PE fragment.
    I googled a few related topics but nobody give out a solid answer or solution, anybody has experienced this before?

    Thanks,
    Simon

    ---- Chrysalis ----
    -------------------

    mkdir: cannot create directory `/local_scratch/pbs.6227496.pbs01/trinityoutput/chrysalis': File exists
    ###########################################################
    ## Running Bowtie to map fragment ends to Inchworm Contigs
    ## to use pairing info for Chrysalis' clustering
    ###############################################################

    CMD: ln -sf /local_scratch/pbs.6227496.pbs01/trinityoutput/inchworm.K25.L25.DS.fa target.fa
    CMD: bowtie-build -q target.fa target
    CMD: bowtie -a -m 20 --best --strata --threads 16 --quiet --chunkmbs 512 -q -S --sam-nohead -f target both.fa > bowtie.out
    CMD: /local_scratch/pbs.6227496.pbs01/trinityrnaseq_r2013_08_14/Chrysalis//../trinity-plugins/coreutils/bin/sort --parallel=16 -T . -$
    CMD: rm bowtie.out
    CMD: /local_scratch/pbs.6227496.pbs01/trinityrnaseq_r2013_08_14/Chrysalis//../util/scaffold_iworm_contigs.pl bowtie.nameSorted.sam /l$
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:100038 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:100038 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:100652 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:100652 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:11363 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:11363 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:11363 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:15314 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:15314 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:21043 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:21043 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    number of read warnings exceeded 10. Turning off warning messages from here out.
    ERROR: note there were 326239257 reads that could not be deciphered as being /1 or /2 of a PE fragment. Hopefully, these were SE reads that should have been ignored. Otherwise, please research this further.

  • atcghelix
    Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 74

    #2
    What do the first few reads in the both.fa file look like?

    Comment

    • Simonli
      Member
      • Oct 2013
      • 14

      #3
      I see the problems now, check below, I don`t have the "/1" or "/2" in my both.fa file. How is that happening? Should I check the first step of the inchworm?

      >HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:7:1101:2055:1989 1:N:0:ATCATG
      AACAATTTCATCCTCGAATCCTACCACACGGGCGCTGGCACCGCCTACGCCGTCCTCGCTGAGAACACCACCGAAGCCAACCCTCGCACCTTCTACGTGA
      >HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:7:1101:3448:1999 1:N:0:ATCACG
      GTCGTATGCAAAGGATTCAACCCCACGCATTGTAAAATTGCAAGACGCCAGTTAGTCCTAAAGAGTTTCTTCAATAGGACCGTTACCAGCCAGCTAAGAT
      >HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:7:1101:3524:1986 1:N:0:ATCACG
      CTTGTCCTTCTTCTCTTTCCTCTCTTTGGTTTTATCTGACACAAGATCCTTCTCAATCTTATCGAGACTCGGCCTCTGCTTGAGTTTCTCAGAGTCATTA
      >HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:7:1101:4204:1996 1:N:0:ATCACG
      GTGTTAAAAGGGCTAGAGATCGAAATGTTAGACAAAGCGAAATGGAGCAAAGACTGGCAGATCCCAACCAATCCCAATCACGCCGAGAACAAACTTGGTC
      >HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:7:1101:4587:2000 1:N:0:ATCACG

      Comment

      • Simonli
        Member
        • Oct 2013
        • 14

        #4
        Check the reply above..

        Comment

        • atcghelix
          Member
          • Jul 2013
          • 74

          #5
          Sounds like Trinity is not properly recognizing the sequence names so that it can add the /1 and /2. Did you modify the read names after receiving the fastq files?

          Of potential interest: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/f...tyrnaseq-users

          You could manually rename the reads in the initial fastq files so that they say /1 and /2.
          Last edited by atcghelix; 10-22-2013, 05:31 PM.

          Comment

          • Simonli
            Member
            • Oct 2013
            • 14

            #6
            Originally posted by atcghelix View Post
            Sounds like Trinity is not properly recognizing the sequence names so that it can add the /1 and /2. Did you modify the read names after receiving the fastq files?

            Of potential interest: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/f...tyrnaseq-users

            You could manually rename the reads in the initial fastq files so that they say /1 and /2.
            Thanks atcghelix,

            When you say manually rename the reads, do you konw what kind of codes can do that?
            I`m new to bioinformatics as well as linux.
            Thanks.

            Comment

            • Simonli
              Member
              • Oct 2013
              • 14

              #7
              Manually put /1 or /2 in the headers, not work

              I have manually put /1 or /2 in the headers, still doesn`t work.....

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • kinpict.com
                Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                by kinpict.com
                The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
                Today, 06:37 PM
              • SEQadmin2
                16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                by SEQadmin2





                NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
                10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
              0 responses
              27 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
              0 responses
              35 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
              2 responses
              56 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post kinpict.com  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
              0 responses
              175 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...