Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Simonli
    Member
    • Oct 2013
    • 14

    When running Bowtie in Chrysalis, unable to decipher reads

    Hi Guys,
    I`m a RNAseq beginner, I`m using ConDeTri to trim and filter the reads, and inchworm is running good, generate a both.fa file, however when I running the step two of Trinity, it shows my reads could not be deciphered as being /1 or /2 of a PE fragment.
    I googled a few related topics but nobody give out a solid answer or solution, anybody has experienced this before?

    Thanks,
    Simon

    ---- Chrysalis ----
    -------------------

    mkdir: cannot create directory `/local_scratch/pbs.6227496.pbs01/trinityoutput/chrysalis': File exists
    ###########################################################
    ## Running Bowtie to map fragment ends to Inchworm Contigs
    ## to use pairing info for Chrysalis' clustering
    ###############################################################

    CMD: ln -sf /local_scratch/pbs.6227496.pbs01/trinityoutput/inchworm.K25.L25.DS.fa target.fa
    CMD: bowtie-build -q target.fa target
    CMD: bowtie -a -m 20 --best --strata --threads 16 --quiet --chunkmbs 512 -q -S --sam-nohead -f target both.fa > bowtie.out
    CMD: /local_scratch/pbs.6227496.pbs01/trinityrnaseq_r2013_08_14/Chrysalis//../trinity-plugins/coreutils/bin/sort --parallel=16 -T . -$
    CMD: rm bowtie.out
    CMD: /local_scratch/pbs.6227496.pbs01/trinityrnaseq_r2013_08_14/Chrysalis//../util/scaffold_iworm_contigs.pl bowtie.nameSorted.sam /l$
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:100038 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:100038 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:100652 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:100652 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:11363 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:11363 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:11363 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:15314 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:15314 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:21043 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    warning, ignoring read: HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:6:1101:10000:21043 since cannot decipher if /1 or /2 of a pair.
    number of read warnings exceeded 10. Turning off warning messages from here out.
    ERROR: note there were 326239257 reads that could not be deciphered as being /1 or /2 of a PE fragment. Hopefully, these were SE reads that should have been ignored. Otherwise, please research this further.

  • atcghelix
    Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 74

    #2
    What do the first few reads in the both.fa file look like?

    Comment

    • Simonli
      Member
      • Oct 2013
      • 14

      #3
      I see the problems now, check below, I don`t have the "/1" or "/2" in my both.fa file. How is that happening? Should I check the first step of the inchworm?

      >HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:7:1101:2055:1989 1:N:0:ATCATG
      AACAATTTCATCCTCGAATCCTACCACACGGGCGCTGGCACCGCCTACGCCGTCCTCGCTGAGAACACCACCGAAGCCAACCCTCGCACCTTCTACGTGA
      >HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:7:1101:3448:1999 1:N:0:ATCACG
      GTCGTATGCAAAGGATTCAACCCCACGCATTGTAAAATTGCAAGACGCCAGTTAGTCCTAAAGAGTTTCTTCAATAGGACCGTTACCAGCCAGCTAAGAT
      >HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:7:1101:3524:1986 1:N:0:ATCACG
      CTTGTCCTTCTTCTCTTTCCTCTCTTTGGTTTTATCTGACACAAGATCCTTCTCAATCTTATCGAGACTCGGCCTCTGCTTGAGTTTCTCAGAGTCATTA
      >HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:7:1101:4204:1996 1:N:0:ATCACG
      GTGTTAAAAGGGCTAGAGATCGAAATGTTAGACAAAGCGAAATGGAGCAAAGACTGGCAGATCCCAACCAATCCCAATCACGCCGAGAACAAACTTGGTC
      >HISEQ:190:C2L5LACXX:7:1101:4587:2000 1:N:0:ATCACG

      Comment

      • Simonli
        Member
        • Oct 2013
        • 14

        #4
        Check the reply above..

        Comment

        • atcghelix
          Member
          • Jul 2013
          • 74

          #5
          Sounds like Trinity is not properly recognizing the sequence names so that it can add the /1 and /2. Did you modify the read names after receiving the fastq files?

          Of potential interest: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/f...tyrnaseq-users

          You could manually rename the reads in the initial fastq files so that they say /1 and /2.
          Last edited by atcghelix; 10-22-2013, 05:31 PM.

          Comment

          • Simonli
            Member
            • Oct 2013
            • 14

            #6
            Originally posted by atcghelix View Post
            Sounds like Trinity is not properly recognizing the sequence names so that it can add the /1 and /2. Did you modify the read names after receiving the fastq files?

            Of potential interest: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/f...tyrnaseq-users

            You could manually rename the reads in the initial fastq files so that they say /1 and /2.
            Thanks atcghelix,

            When you say manually rename the reads, do you konw what kind of codes can do that?
            I`m new to bioinformatics as well as linux.
            Thanks.

            Comment

            • Simonli
              Member
              • Oct 2013
              • 14

              #7
              Manually put /1 or /2 in the headers, not work

              I have manually put /1 or /2 in the headers, still doesn`t work.....

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:09 AM
              0 responses
              9 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 08:59 AM
              0 responses
              16 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
              0 responses
              24 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
              0 responses
              21 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...