SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > 454 (Roche, Nimblegen)

Sponsor this forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-02-2010, 08:30 PM   #1
AKroxy
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Alaska
Posts: 17
Default Does splitting run reduce read number?

If a 454 run is split into 4 separate runs (4 samples), will the total number of reads be smaller than if one full run was done?
Thanks!
AKroxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2010, 05:28 AM   #2
kmcarr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA, Midwest
Posts: 263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AKroxy View Post
If a 454 run is split into 4 separate runs (4 samples), will the total number of reads be smaller than if one full run was done?
Thanks!
Are you asking about dividing the picotiter plate into regions using the supplied gaskets? If so then the answer is yes, you do lose some of the total read capacity of the PTP. Portions of the plate are covered by the divider strip of the gasket, the more divider strips on the gasket the more of the plate is covered and unusable for sequencing. By default the plate is divided into two regions. Gaskets are also provided to divide the plate into 4, 8 or 16 regions. Here is what the Roche documentation says are the expected number of reads per region and for the the whole plate for each gasket:

Code:
Regions    Reads/           Reads/
        Region (10^3)     Run(10^3)
 2        450-650         900-1300
 4        160-250         640-1000
 8         80-120         640- 960
16         25- 40         400- 640
The alternative is to use multiplexed ID tags (bar codes) and then mix your samples together. Discuss with your sequencing facility the costs and benefits of each method.

Last edited by kmcarr; 01-03-2010 at 05:47 AM. Reason: Added read number table.
kmcarr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 11:04 AM   #3
AKroxy
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Alaska
Posts: 17
Default

Thanks tons, kmcarr, that's exactly what I needed to know!
Going from 2 to 4 sections actually seems like a substantial reduction in data (>23%)
AKroxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.